Cognition
This encyclopedia entry is in preparation.
Abramova E. & Slors M. (2019) Mechanistic explanation for enactive sociality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18(2): 401–424. https://cepa.info/5837
Abramova E., Slors M. & van Rooij I. (2017) Enactive mechanistic explanation of social cognition. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science SocietyCognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 45–50. https://cepa.info/5795
Ackermann E. K. (2010) Constructivism(s): Shared roots, crossed paths, multiple legacies. In: Clayson J. & Kalas I. (eds.) Constructionist approaches to creative learning, thinking and education: Lessons for the 21st century. Proceedings of Constructionism 2010Comenius University, Bratislava: 1–9. https://cepa.info/6082
Aftab A. & Nielsen K. (2021) From Engel to Enactivism: Contextualizing the biopsychosocial model. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 17(2): 5–22. https://cepa.info/8463
Agostini E. & Francesconi D. (2021) Introduction to the special issue “embodied cognition and education”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20: 417–422. https://cepa.info/8144
Aguado J. M. (2009) Information, self-reference and observation theory in the context of social sciences epistemology. tripleC 7(2): 344–356. https://cepa.info/8444
Aguayo C. (2023) Autopoiesis and 4E+ Cognition in the Design of Digital Learning Affordances. Constructivist Foundations 18(2): 325–337. https://constructivist.info/18/2.325
Aizawa K. (2015) What is this cognition that is supposed to be embodied?. Philosophical Psychology 28(6): 755–775. https://cepa.info/3949
Allen M. & Friston K. (2018) From cognitivism to autopoiesis: Towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese 195(6): 2459–2482. https://cepa.info/4099
Alroe H. F. (2000) Science as systems learning: Some reflections on the cognitive and communicational aspects of science. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 7(4): 57–78. https://cepa.info/3160
Anderson M. L., Richardson M. J. & Chemero A. (2012) Eroding the boundaries of cognition: Implications of embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(4): 717–730. https://cepa.info/5572
Anker K. (2012) Instances of Consciousness An Essay on the Signs of Evolution. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 19(4): 43–60. https://cepa.info/3377
Aparicio J. J. & Moneo M. R. (2005) Constructivism, the so-called semantic learning theories, and situated cognition versus the psychological learning theories. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 8(2): 180–198. https://cepa.info/7356
Apps M. A. & Tsakiris M. (2014) The free-energy self: A predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 41: 85–97. https://cepa.info/5544
Asaro P. M. (2009) Information and regulation in robots, perception and consciousness: Ashby’s embodied minds. International Journal of General Systems 38(2): 111–128. https://cepa.info/348
Balsemão Pires E. (2018) Sequencialidade do sentido e formas cognitivas [Sequentiality of meaning and cognitive forms]. Independently published with Kindle, Amazon. https://cepa.info/4572
Barandiaran X. & Moreno A. (2006) On what makes certain dynamical systems cognitive: A minimally cognitive organization program. Adaptive Behavior 14(2): 171–185. https://cepa.info/4513
Barrett L. (2016) Why brains are not computers, why behaviorism is not satanism, and why dolphins are not aquatic apes. The Behavior Analyst 39(1): 9–23. https://cepa.info/5060
Barrett N. F. (2017) The normative turn in enactive theory: An examination of its roots and implications. Topoi 36(3): 431–443. https://cepa.info/2473
Beltrame R. (2007) The Theoretical Environment around 1965. Constructivist Foundations 2(2-3): 25–28. https://constructivist.info/2/2-3.25
Bianchini F. (2023) Autopoiesis of the artificial: From systems to cognition. Biosystems 230: 104936. https://cepa.info/8637
Bich L. & Damiano L. (2012) Life, Autonomy and Cognition: An Organizational Approach to the Definition of the Universal Properties of Life. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 42(5): 389–397. https://cepa.info/2316
Bich L. (2018) Robustness and autonomy in biological systems: How regulatory mechanisms enable functional integration, complexity and minimal cognition through the action of second-order control constraints. In: Bertolaso M., Caianiello S. & Serrelli E. (eds.) Biological robustness: Emerging perspectives from within the life sciencesSpringer, Cham: 123–147. https://cepa.info/5659
Bickhard M. H. (1993) On why constructivism does not yield relativism. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5: 275–284. https://cepa.info/4465
Borghi A. M. & Caruana F. (2015) Embodiment theory. In: Wright J. D. (ed.) International encyclopedia of the social & sciences. Second edition. Volume 7Elsevier, Amsterdam: 420–426. https://cepa.info/5880
Borghi A. M. & Cimatti F. (2010) Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia 48(3): 763–773. https://cepa.info/8392
Bourgine P. & Stewart J. (2004) Autopoiesis and cognition. Artificial Life 10: 327–345. https://cepa.info/2263
Briedis M. (2019) Phenomenological ethnography can lead to the improvement of radiology diagnostics. Adaptive Behavior Online first. https://cepa.info/6106
Brier S. (1996) From second-order cybernetics to cybersemiotics: A semiotic re-entry into the second-order cybernetics of Heinz von Foerster. Systems Research 13(3): 229–244. https://cepa.info/3989
Brocklesby J. (2011) From building environmental representations to structural coupling: An autopoietic theory perspective on the theory and practice of strategic management. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 28(6): 618–630. https://cepa.info/2531
Buhrmann T., Di Paolo E. & Barandiaran X. (2013) A dynamical systems account of sensorimotor contingencies. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 285. https://cepa.info/2386
Butnor A. & MacKenzie M. (2022) Enactivism and gender performativity. In: Maitra K. & McWeeny J. (eds.) Feminist philosophy of mindOxford University Press, New York: 190–206. https://cepa.info/8753
Butz M. V. (2008) How and Why the Brain Lays the Foundations for a Conscious Self. Constructivist Foundations 4(1): 1–14 & 32–37. https://constructivist.info/4/1.1
Cappuccio M. L. (2017) Mind-upload: The ultimate challenge to the embodied mind theory. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16(3): 425–448. https://cepa.info/5725
Cariani P. (2015) Outline of a cybernetic theory of brain function based on neural timing nets. Kybernetes 44(8/9): 1219–1232. https://cepa.info/4141
Carmona C. (2018) Dance and embodied cognition: Motivations for the enactivist program. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 12(2): 31–43. https://cepa.info/7805
Carney J. (2020) Thinking avant la lettre: A Review of 4E Cognition. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 4(1): 77–90. https://cepa.info/7884
Christ O., Sambasivam M., Roos A. & Zahn C. (2021) Learning in immersive virtual reality: How does the 4E cognition approach fit in virtual didactic settings. In: Ahram T. & Taiar R. (eds.) Human interaction, emerging technologies and future systems V (IHIET 2021)Springer, Cham: 790–796. https://cepa.info/8148
Clarke B. (2012) From Information to Cognition: The Systems Counterculture, Heinz von Foerster’s Pedagogy, and Second-Order Cybernetics. Constructivist Foundations 7(3): 196-207. https://constructivist.info/7/3.196
Clavel Vázquez M. J. (2020) Two challenges to the embodied version of the autopoietic theory. Adaptive Behavior 28(1): 41–42. https://cepa.info/6287
Cohen L. B., Chaput H. H. & Cashon C. H. (2002) A constructivist model of infant cognition. Cognitive Development 17: 1323–1343. https://cepa.info/5849
Costa M. R., Kim S. Y. & Biocca F. (2013) Embodiment and embodied cognition. In: Shumaker R. (ed.) Virtual, augmented and mixed reality: Designing and developing augmented and virtual environmentsSpringer, Heidelberg: 333–342. https://cepa.info/7680
Cowley S. & Madsen J. K. (2014) Time and Temporality: Linguistic Distribution in Human Life-games. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 21(1–2): 172–185. https://cepa.info/3580
Cowley S. & Nash L. (2013) Language, interactivity and solution probing: Repetition without repetition. Adaptive Behavior 21(3): 187–198. https://cepa.info/6108
Cowley S. (2007) How human infants deal with symbol grounding. Interaction Studies 8(1): 83–104. https://cepa.info/5649
Cowley S. (2014) The Integration Problem: Interlacing Language, Action and Perception. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 21(1–2): 53–65. https://cepa.info/3415
Cowley S. J. (2018) Life and language: Is meaning biosemiotic?. Language Sciences 67: 46–58. https://cepa.info/5863
Cowley S. J. (2019) Languaging evolved: A distributed perspective. Chinese Semiotic Studies 15(4): 461–482. https://cepa.info/8081
Cummins F. (2014) Agency is distinct from autonomy. Avant 5(2): 98–112. https://cepa.info/5062
Cyzman M. (2013) Beyond Objectiveness: Non-dualism and Fiction. Constructivist Foundations 8(2): 173-182. https://constructivist.info/8/2.173
Cárdenas-García J. F. & Ireland T. (2017) Human distributed cognition from an organism-in-its-environment perspective. Biosemiotics 10(2): 265–278. https://cepa.info/8016
Damiano L. & Luisi P. L. (2010) Towards an autopoietic redefinition of life. Origin of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 40(2): 145–149. https://cepa.info/2689
Damiano L. & Stano P. (2018) Synthetic biology and artificial intelligence: Grounding a cross-disciplinary approach to the synthetic exploration of (embodied) cognition. Complex Systems 27: 199–228. https://cepa.info/7614
Damiano L. & Stano P. (2021) A wetware embodied AI? Towards an autopoietic organizational approach grounded in synthetic biology. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 9: 724023. https://cepa.info/7615
Danielyan N. (2017) Constructivism representatives about cognition process. Philosophy 7(2): 75–86. https://cepa.info/8228
Day M. (2009) Constructing religion without the social: Durkheim, Latour, and extended cognition. Zygon 44(3): 719–737. https://cepa.info/8426
De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507. https://cepa.info/2387
De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sensemaking. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507. https://cepa.info/5063
De Jaegher H. & Froese T. (2009) On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive Behavior 17(5): 444–460. https://cepa.info/4717
De Jaegher H. (2021) Loving and knowing: Reflections for an engaged epistemology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 20(5): 847–870. https://cepa.info/7689
De Jesus P. (2014) Can the revolution be optimised? Oh yes it can! But, maybe not. Report on the one day symposium on “Varieties of Enactivism”. Connection Science 26(3): 293–296. https://cepa.info/4549
Di Paolo E. & De Jaegher H. (2017) Neither individualistic nor interactionist. In: Durt C., Fuchs T. & Tewes C. (eds.) Embodiment, enaction, and cultureMIT Press, Cambridge MA: 87–105. https://cepa.info/2301
Dierckxsens G. & Bergmann L. T. (2022) Enactive ethics and hermeneutics: From bodily normativity to critical ethics. Topoi 41(2): 299–312. https://cepa.info/7694
Drayson Z. (2009) Embodied cognitive science and its implications for psychopathology.. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology 16(4): 329–340. https://cepa.info/7846
Duijzer C., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M. H. A. M., Veldhuis M., Doorman M. & Leseman P. (2019) Embodied learning environments for graphing motion: A systematic literature review. Educational Psychology Review 31: 597–629. https://cepa.info/7985
Enslin M. (2013) Listening and Unentitled. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 20(1–2): 23–29. https://cepa.info/3378
Etxeberria A., Merelo J. J. & Moreno A. (1994) Studying organisms with basic cognitive capacities in artificial worlds. Cognitiva 3(2): 203–218. https://cepa.info/3929
Fabry R. E. (2017) Transcending the evidentiary boundary: Prediction error minimization, embodied interaction, and explanatory pluralism. Philosophical Psychology 30: 395–414. https://cepa.info/7848
Fedulov I. N. & Khudobina O. F. (2017) О радикальности конструирования в «радикальном конструктивизме» [About the radicalism of construction in “radical constructivism”]. Science Journal of Volgograd State University: Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies 16(1): 36–44. https://cepa.info/8069
Feiten T. E. (2020) Mind after Uexküll: A foray into the worlds of ecological psychologists and enactivists. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 480. https://cepa.info/6628
Fiebich A. (2019) Second workshop on enactive approaches to mind in health and disease. Adaptive Behavior 27(3): 181–182. https://cepa.info/6111
Foerster H. von (1996) Wahrnehmen oder Falschnehmen. In: Doering W., Doering W., Dose G. & Stadelmann M. (eds.) Sinn und Sinne im DialogBorgmann, Dortmund: 115–130. https://cepa.info/2638
Foerster H. von (1997) L’arte dell apprendimento. Pluriverso 2(2): 79–86. https://cepa.info/2660
Foerster H. von (1998) Sistemica Elemental Desde Un Punto De Vista Superior. Fonda Editorial Universidad EAFIT, Medellin, Colombia. https://cepa.info/2667
Foerster H. von (1998) Über Bewußtsein, Gedächtnis, Sprache, Magie und andere unbegreifliche Alltäglichkeiten. In: Bibliothek der Feldenkrais-Gilde e.V. Nr. 11Feldenkrais-Gilde, Munich: 4–23. https://cepa.info/2666
Foerster H. von (1998) Über Perzeption: Eine Sokalogische Abhandlung in vier Abschnitten. Tumult 23: 81–85. https://cepa.info/2663
Foerster H. von (1999) Tesseract; Triviale und Nicht-Triviale Maschinen,; Objektivität; H.V.F. Theorem 2; Order from Noise; Kybernetik. In: Schmidt A. P. (ed.) Der Wissensnavigator: Das Lexikon der ZukunftDeutsche Verlagsanstalt, Stuttgart: 13; 103; 108; 25. https://cepa.info/2674
Foerster H. von (ed.) (1995) Cybernetics of cybernetics. Second edition. Future Systems Inc., Minneapolis. https://cepa.info/1774
Frith E., Miller S. & Loprinzi P. D. (2020) A review of experimental research on embodied creativity: Revisiting the mind–body connection. The Journal of Creative Behavior 54(4): 767–798. https://cepa.info/8122
Froese T. & Di Paolo E. (2011) The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics and Cognition 19(1): 1–36. https://cepa.info/2367
Froese T. & Di Paolo E. A. (2009) Sociality and the life–mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(4): 439–463. https://cepa.info/4460
Froese T. & Fuchs T. (2012) The extended body: A case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11: 205–235. https://cepa.info/2389
Froese T. & Gallagher S. (2012) Getting interaction theory (IT) together: Integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction. Interaction Studies 13(3): 436–468. https://cepa.info/2368
Froese T. (2012) From adaptive behavior to human cognition: A review of Enaction. Adaptive Behavior 20: 209–221. https://cepa.info/4738
Froese T. (2023) Irruption theory: A novel conceptualization of the enactive account of motivated activity. Entropy 25(5): 748. https://cepa.info/8412
Froese T., Woodward A. & Ikegami T. (2013) Turing instabilities in biology, culture, and consciousness? On the enactive origins of symbolic material culture. Adaptive Behavior 21(3): 199–214. https://cepa.info/6358
Gahrn-Andersen R. & Prinz R. (2023) Ensuring wholeness: Using Code Biology to overcome the autonomy-heteronomy divide. Biosystems 226: 104874. https://cepa.info/8474
Gallagher S. & Allen M. (2018) Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition. Synthese 195(6): 2627–2648. https://cepa.info/4222
Gallagher S. & Miyahara K. (2012) Neo-pragmatism and enactive intentionality. In: Schulkin J. (ed.) Action, perception and the brain: Adaptation and cephalic expressionPalgrave Macmillan, London: 117–146. https://cepa.info/7355
Gallagher S. (2008) Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition 17(2): 535–543. https://cepa.info/5645
Gallagher S. (2016) Intercorporeity: Enaction, simulation, and the science of social cognition. In: Reynolds J. & Sebold R. (eds.) Phenomenology and sciencePalgrave Macmillan, New York: 161–179. https://cepa.info/6193
Gallagher S. (2018) Decentering the Brain: Embodied Cognition and the Critique of Neurocentrism and Narrow-Minded Philosophy of Mind. Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 8–21. https://constructivist.info/14/1.8
Gallagher S. (2023) Embodied and enactive approaches to cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://cepa.info/8721
Garland E. L. (2007) The meaning of mindfulness: A second-order cybernetics of stress, metacognition, and coping. Complementary Health Practice Review 12(1): 15. https://cepa.info/4098
Gash H. (2011) Society, ethics and constructivism. In: Lasker G. E. & Hassard Frank R. (eds.) Strategic planning for the futureInternational Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics, Tecumseh Ontario Canada: 1–5. https://cepa.info/2922
Gash H. (2016) Zen and constructivist thinking. In: Lasker G. E. & Hiwaki K. (eds.) Personal and spiritual development in the world of cultural diversity. Vol XIIIInternational Institute for Advanced Studies, Tecumseh Ontario: 23–27. https://cepa.info/2692
Gash H. (2018) Constructivism and mysticism. In: Lasker G. E. (ed.) Personal and spiritual development in the world of cultural diversity. Volume XVInternational Institute for Advanced Studies, Tecumseh ON: 7–11. https://cepa.info/5523
Gash H. (2019) Constructivism and Mystical Experience. Constructivist Foundations 15(1): 1–9. https://constructivist.info/15/1.1
Georgeon O. L. & Ritter F. E. (2012) An intrinsically-motivated schema mechanism to model and simulate emergent cognition. Cognitive Systems Research 15–16: 73–92. https://cepa.info/5028
Georgeon O., Mille A. & Gay S. (2016) Intelligence artificielle sans données ontologiques sur une réalité presupposée [Artificial intelligence without using ontological data about a presupposed reality]. Intellectica 65: 143–168. https://cepa.info/3662
Georgeon O., Mille A. & Gay S. (2016) Intelligence artificielle sans données ontologiques sur une réalité présupposée [Artificial intelligence without using ontological data about a presupposed reality]. Intellectica 65: 143–168. https://cepa.info/5025
Glanville R. (1990) “Sed quis custodient ipsos custodes?”. In: Heylighen F., Rosseel E & Demeyere F. (eds.) Self-steering and cognition in complex systemsGordon and Breach, London: 107–112. https://cepa.info/8523
Glasersfeld E. von & Cobb P. (1983) Knowledge as environmental fit. Man-Environment Systems 13(5): 216–224. https://cepa.info/1374
Glasersfeld E. von & Shumaker N. W. (1976) Review of Schank’s “Conceptual Information Processing”. Computers and the Humanities 10(4): 236–237. https://cepa.info/1331
Glasersfeld E. von & Steffe L. P. (1991) Conceptual models in educational research and practice. Journal of Educational Thought 25(2): 91–103. https://cepa.info/1419
Glasersfeld E. von & Varela F. J. (1985) Problems of knowledge and cognizing organisms. Aprendizagem/Desenvolvimento (Learning and Development) 2(6): 17–23. https://cepa.info/1379
Glasersfeld E. von (1966) Beauty and the mechanics of perception. Rivista Pininfarina. Stabilimenti Pininfarina, Turin . https://cepa.info/1303
Glasersfeld E. von (1968) Alla ricerca di dati precisi. Nuovo 2: 36–40. https://cepa.info/1306
Glasersfeld E. von (1972) Reading, understanding, and conceptual situations. In: Greene F. P. (ed.) 21st Yearbook of the National Reading ConferenceN. C. R., Milwaukee WI: 119–127. https://cepa.info/1313
Glasersfeld E. von (1976) Cybernetics and cognitive development. Cybernetics Forum 8: 115–120. https://cepa.info/1333
Glasersfeld E. von (1977) Seen from the outside. Contact Quarterly II(3): 23. https://cepa.info/1337
Glasersfeld E. von (1978) Another minor revision, or the disregard for control theory and the analysis of inductive feedback systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1(1): 79–80. https://cepa.info/1341
Glasersfeld E. von (1978) Some problems of intentionality [Commentary on Haugeland’s “The nature and plausibility of cognitivism”]. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1(2): 252–253. https://cepa.info/1343
Glasersfeld E. von (1979) Radical constructivism and Jean Piaget’s concept of knowledge. In: Murray F. B. (ed.) The impact of Piagetian theoryUniversity Park Press, Baltimore MD: 109–122. https://cepa.info/1340
Glasersfeld E. von (1980) The concept of equilibration in a constructivist theory of knowledge. In: Benseler F., Hejl P. M. & Koeck W. K. (eds.) Autopoiesis, communication, and societyCampus, Frankfurt/New York: 75–85. https://cepa.info/1352
Glasersfeld E. von (1981) An attentional model for the conceptual construction of units and number. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 12(2): 83–94. https://cepa.info/1356
Glasersfeld E. von (1981) An epistemology for cognitive systems. In: Roth G. & Schwegler H. (eds.) Self-organizing systemsCampus, Frankfurt: 121–131. https://cepa.info/1358
Glasersfeld E. von (1981) Feedback, induction, and epistemology. In: Lasker G. E. (ed.) Applied systems and cybernetics. Volume 2: Systems concepts, models and methodologyPergamon Press, New York: 712–719. https://cepa.info/1359
Glasersfeld E. von (1981) The conception and perception of number. In: Wagner S. & Geeslin W. E. (eds.) Modeling mathematical cognitive developmentClearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education, Columbus OH: 15–46. https://cepa.info/1353
Glasersfeld E. von (1981) The “truth” about Pythagoras. Problem Solving 3(5/6): 1–11. https://cepa.info/1361
Glasersfeld E. von (1982) Cheers for the champion?. Problem Solving 4(9): 6. https://cepa.info/1365
Glasersfeld E. von (1982) Subitizing – The role of figural patterns in the development of numerical concepts. Archives de Psychologie 50: 191–218. https://cepa.info/1364
Glasersfeld E. von (1983) Learning as a constructive activity. In: Bergeron J. C. & Herscovics N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the North American Group of Psychology in Mathematics Education, Vol. 1PME-NA, Montreal: 41–69. https://cepa.info/1373
Glasersfeld E. von (1984) To hell with psychology (Book review). Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 15(5): 389–391. https://cepa.info/1377
Glasersfeld E. von (1985) Reconstructing the concept of knowledge. Archives de Psychologie 53: 91–101. https://cepa.info/1380
Glasersfeld E. von (1986) Of knowing, telling, and showing. Cybernetic 2(1): 64–67. https://cepa.info/1394
Glasersfeld E. von (1986) Wissen ohne Erkenntnis. Delfin 4(1): 20–27. https://cepa.info/1393
Glasersfeld E. von (1987) Preliminaries to any theory of representation. In: Janvier C. (ed.) Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematicsErlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 215–225. https://cepa.info/1395
Glasersfeld E. von (1990) Teleology and the concepts of causation. Philosophica 46(2): 17–43. https://cepa.info/1416
Glasersfeld E. von (1990) Zuerst muß man zu zweit sein [You have to be two to start]. Systeme – Zeitschrift der Österreichischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für sytemische Therapie 46(2): 17–43. https://cepa.info/1417
Glasersfeld E. von (1991) Abstraction, re-presentation, and reflection. In: Steffe L. P. (ed.) Epistemological foundations of mathematical experienceSpringer, New York: 45–67. https://cepa.info/1418
Glasersfeld E. von (1993) Notes on the concept of change. Cahiers de la Fondation Archives Jean Piaget 13: 91–96. https://cepa.info/1445
Glasersfeld E. von (1993) Reflections on number and counting. In: Boysen S. T. & Capaldi E. J. (eds.) The development of numerical ability: Animal and human modelsErlbaum, Hillsdale: 225–243. https://cepa.info/1440
Glasersfeld E. von (1994) Das Hervorbringen von Wissen und Wirklichkeit. In: Heines K.-D. (ed.) Menschsein in unserer Zeit – Der Zeitgeist auf dem Prüfstand. Stiftung DrHeines, Bremen: 107–117. https://cepa.info/1458
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London. https://cepa.info/1462
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Sensory experience, abstraction, and teaching. In: Steffe L. P. & Gale J. (eds.) Constructivism in educationErlbaum, Hillsdale: 369–383. https://cepa.info/1461
Glasersfeld E. von (1998) Anticipation in the constructivist theory of cognition. In: Dubois D. M. (ed.) Computing anticipatory systemsAmerican Institute of Physics, Woodbury NY: 38–47. https://cepa.info/1496
Glasersfeld E. von (1998) Die Radikal-Konstruktivistische Wissenstheorie. Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften 9(4): 503–511. https://cepa.info/1500
Glasersfeld E. von (1999) A model for the construction of elementary concepts. In: Dubois D. M. (ed.) Computing anticipatory systemsAmerican Institute of Physics, Woodbury NY: 45–52. https://cepa.info/1504
Glasersfeld E. von (1999) Piaget’s legacy: Cognition as adaptive activity. In: Riegler A., Peschl M. & Stein A. (eds.) Understanding representation in the cognitive sciencesKluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York/Dordrecht: 283–287. https://cepa.info/1514
Glasersfeld E. von (2000) A proposito dell’operare costitutivo [About constitutive operating]. Methodologia Working Papers 122: 1–2. https://cepa.info/1524
Glasersfeld E. von (2000) Entretien avec E. v. G. Interview by Claudie Natale Schouchana. Thérapie Familiale 21(1): 27–32. https://cepa.info/1518
Glasersfeld E. von (2000) Gesellschaft als subjektive Erfahrung [Society as subjective experience]. Contribition to Festschrift for Siegfried Schmidt at http://www.sjschmidt.net. https://cepa.info/1522
Glasersfeld E. von (2001) Risposta a Ranci. Methodologia Working Papers 132(1). https://cepa.info/1535
Glasersfeld E. von (2003) Nota alla postfazione di Accame. Methodologia Working Papers 150(1). https://cepa.info/1544
Glasersfeld E. von (2004) Knowledge without knower?. Karl Jaspers Forum TA69C10. https://cepa.info/1549
Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Informationsübertragung, Konzeptuelle Semantik, Kybernetik, Objektivität, Wissen als Konstruk, Zeitkonzept. In: Tsvasman L. R. (ed.) Das große Lexikon, Medien und KommunikationErgon, Würzburg: 145, 211, 212, 2. https://cepa.info/1557
Glasersfeld E. von, Steffe L. P. & Richards J. (1983) An analysis of counting and what is counted. In: Steffe L. P., Glasersfeld E. von, Richards J. & Cobb P. (eds.) Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory, and applicationPraeger, New York: 21–44. https://cepa.info/1370
Goldinger S. D., Papesh M. H., Barnhart A. S., Hansen W. A. & Hout M. C. (2016) The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 23(4): 959–978. https://cepa.info/7984
Gonzalez-Grandón X. & Froese T. (2018) Grounding 4E cognition in Mexico: Introduction to special issue on spotlight on 4E cognition research in Mexico. Adaptive Behavior 26(5): 189–198. https://cepa.info/5562
González X. (2013) La auto-producción de la subjetividad: autopoiesis y cognición corporizada de alto nivel [The self-production of subjectivity: Autopoiesis and high-level cognition]. In: Razeto P. & Ramos R. (eds.) Autopoiesis un concepto vivo. Colección ciencias estructuralesUniversitas Nueva civilización, Santiago: 95–118. https://cepa.info/2524
Grasso-Cladera A., Costa-Cordella S., Rossi A., Fuchs N. F. & Parada F. J. (2022) Mobile Brain/Body Imaging: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of research programs based on the 4E perspective to cognition. Adaptive Behavior Online first. https://cepa.info/8691
Hardcastle V. (2017) Radical embodied cognition, affordances, and the (hard) problem of consciousness. In: In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science SocietyCognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 476–481. https://cepa.info/5796
Harnad S. (2007) Maturana’s autopoietic hermeneutics versus Turing’s causal methodology for explaining cognition. Pragmatics & Cognition 15(3): 599–603. https://cepa.info/6853
Harvey I. (2020) Neurath’s boat and the Sally-Anne test: Life, cognition, matter and stuff. Adaptive Behavior 29(5): 459–470. https://cepa.info/6278
Harvey I. (2021) Neurath’s boat and the Sally-Anne test: Life, cognition, matter and stuff. Adaptive Behavior 29(5): 459–470. https://cepa.info/7440
Herrera Pérez C. & Ziemke T. (2007) Aristotle, autonomy and the explanation of behaviour. Pragmatics & Cognition 15(3): 547–571. https://cepa.info/6857
Herschbach M. (2012) On the role of social interaction in social cognition: A mechanistic alternative to enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11(4): 467–486. https://cepa.info/5834
Heylighen F. & Busseniers E. (2023) Modeling autopoiesis and cognition with reaction networks. Biosystems 230: 104937. https://cepa.info/8470
Hoffman D. D., Singh M. & Prakash C. (2015) The interface theory of perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22(6): 1480–1506. https://cepa.info/4555
Hohwy J. (2020) New directions in predictive processing. Mind & Language 35(2): 209–223. https://cepa.info/7841
Honkela T. (2005) Von Foerster meets Kohonen: Approaches to artificial intelligence, cognitive science and information systems development. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 40–53. https://cepa.info/5169
Hug T. (2023) Education and 4E Cognition: Some Challenges at the Crossroads of Learning and Bildung. Constructivist Foundations 18(2): 158–168. https://constructivist.info/18/2.158
Hutto D. D. & Myin E. (2018) Much ado about nothing? Why going non-semantic is not merely semantics. Philosophical Explorations 21(2): 187–203. https://cepa.info/5820
Hutto D. D. (2019) Re-doing the math: Making enactivism add up. Philosophical Studies 176(3): 827–837. https://cepa.info/5723
Hutto D., Kirchhoff M. & Myin E. (2014) Extensive enactivism: Why keep it all in?. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 706. https://cepa.info/2392
Jones J. (2005) The Cybersemiotic Roots Of Computation: A Critique of the Computational Model of Cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 12(3): 7–29. https://cepa.info/3289
Jurgens A. & Kirchhoff M. D. (2019) Enactive social cognition: Diachronic constitution & coupled anticipation. Consciousness and Cognition 70: 1–10. https://cepa.info/5857
Kaplan D. M. (2012) How to demarcate the boundaries of cognition. Biology & Philosophy 27(4): 545–570. https://cepa.info/5896
Kenny V. (2012) Continuous Dialogues III: Processes of Construction Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Answers to a Wide Variety of Questioners on the Oikos Web Site 1997–2010. Constructivist Foundations 7(3): 208-221. https://constructivist.info/7/3.208
Kersten L., Dewhurst J. & Deane G. (2017) Resolving two tensions in 4E cognition using wide computationalism. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science SocietyCognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 2395–2400. https://cepa.info/5683
Kiefer A. & Hohwy J. (2018) Content and misrepresentation in hierarchical generative models. Synthese 195(6): 2387–2415. https://cepa.info/5387
Kirsh D. (2013) Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20: 1–30. https://cepa.info/8645
Kiverstein J. & Miller M. (2015) The embodied brain: Towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9: 237. https://cepa.info/2281
Knyazeva H. (2009) Nonlinear cobweb of cognition. Foundations of Science 14: 167–179. https://cepa.info/3910
Kordes U. (2005) A peaceful coexistence of epistemologies: Philosophy from the constructivist’s point of view. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 295–305. https://cepa.info/5172
Kordeš U. (2005) A peaceful coexistence of epistemologies – philosophy from the constructivist’s point of view. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 295–305. https://cepa.info/2369
Kravchenko A. (2006) Cognitive linguistics, biology of cognition and biosemiotics: Bridging the gaps. Language Sciences 28(1): 51–75. https://cepa.info/5709
Kravchenko A. V. (2007) Whence the autonomy? A response to Harnad and Dror. Pragmatics & Cognition 15(3): 587–597. https://cepa.info/6852
Kravchenko A. V. (2021) Information technologies, literacy, and cognitive development: An ecolinguistic view. Language Sciences 84(101368). https://cepa.info/7366
Kravchenko A. V. (2022) Язык и природа человечности (приглашение к дискуссии). Slovo.ru: Baltic accent 13(3): 7–24. https://cepa.info/8082
Kronsted C., Gallagher S., Tollefsen D. & Windsor L. (2023) An enactivist account of the dynamics of lying. Adaptive Behavior 32(1): 3–16. https://cepa.info/8366
Kuokkanen J. & Rusanen A. M. (2018) Making too many enemies: Hutto and Myin’s attack on computationalism. Philosophical Explorations 21(2): 282–294. https://cepa.info/5841
Kyselo M. & Di Paolo E. (2015) Locked-in syndrome: A challenge for embodied cognitive science. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 14(3): 517–542. https://cepa.info/2283
Kyselo M. (2013) Locked-in syndrome and BCI: Towards an enactive approach to the self. Neuroethics 6(3): 579–591. https://cepa.info/4343
Kyselo M. (2015) The enactive approach and disorders of the self: The case of schizophrenia. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15(4): 591–616. https://cepa.info/4344
Langland-Hassan P. (2021) Why pretense poses a problem for 4E cognition (and how to move forward). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Online first. https://cepa.info/7293
Lenartowicz M., Weinbaum D. & Braathen P. (2016) The individuation of social systems: A cognitive framework. Procedia Computer Science 88: 15–20. https://cepa.info/4759
Leonardi G. (2014) The Viability of Recurrence Analysis Methods for Processes Drawing on Different Time Scales. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 21(1–2): 158–171. https://cepa.info/3571
Limone A. & Bastias L. E. (2006) Autopoiesis and knowledge in the organization: Conceptual foundation for authentic knowledge management. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23: 39–49. https://cepa.info/3934
Loaiza J. M. (2016) Musicking, embodiment and participatory enaction of music: Outline and key points. Connection Science 28(4): 410–422. https://cepa.info/7601
Lobo L. (2019) Current alternatives on perceptual learning: Introduction to special issue on post-cognitivist approaches to perceptual learning. Adaptive Behavior 27(6): 355–362. https://cepa.info/6286
Louchakova-Schwartz O. (2013) Cognitive phenomenology in the study of Tibetan meditation: Phenomenological descriptions versus meditation styles. In: Gordon S. (ed.) Neurophenomenology and its applications to psychologySpringer, New York: 61–87. https://cepa.info/7310
Love N. (2004) Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences 26: 525–544. https://cepa.info/6237
Lucantoni M. & Luisi P. L. (2012) On the universality of the living: A few epistemological notes. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 42(5): 385–387. https://cepa.info/8132
Luisi P. L. (2022) Consciousness: An unresolved question, and what Maturana has to say about it. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 29(1–2): 99–106. https://cepa.info/8902
Lyon P. (2004) Autopoiesis and knowing: Reflections on Maturana’s Biogenic Explanation of Cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 11(4): 21–46. https://cepa.info/3287
Lyon P. (2006) The biogenic approach to cognition. Cognitive Processing 7(1): 11–29. https://cepa.info/7768
Madsen J. & Cowley S. (2014) Living Subjectivity: Time Scales, Language, and the Fluidity of the Self. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 21(1–2): 11–22. https://cepa.info/3311
Madsen J. (2014) Approaching Bayesian Subjectivity from a Temporal Perspective. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 21(1–2): 98–112. https://cepa.info/3507
Malinin L. (2016) Creative practices embodied, embedded, and enacted in architectural settings: Toward an ecological model of creativity. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1978. https://cepa.info/8125
Marin L. (2022) Enactive principles for an ethics of social media user interactions: How to overcome systematic misunderstandings through shared meaning-making. Topoi, Online first. https://cepa.info/7700
Martin R. J. (2015) Second-Order cybernetics, Radical Constructivism, and the Biology of Cognition: Paradigms Struggling to Bring About Change. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(2–3): 169–182. https://cepa.info/2467
Maturana H. R. (1980) Introduction. In: Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (eds.) Autopoiesis and cognitionReidel, Boston: xi–xxx. https://cepa.info/553
Maturana H. R. (1990) Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. In: Krohn W., Küppers G. & Nowotny H. (eds.) Selforganization: Portrait of a scientific revolutionKluwer, Dordrecht: 12–35. https://cepa.info/607
Maturana H. R. (2002) Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 9(3–4): 5–34. https://cepa.info/685
Maturana H. R. (2005) The origin and conservation of self-consciousness: Reflections on four questions by Heinz von Foerster. In: Riegler A. (ed.) Heinz von Foerster – in memoriam. Kybernetes: The International Journal of Systems & Cybernetics 34(1–2): 54–88. https://cepa.info/702
Maturana H. R., Dávila X. Y. & Ramírez S. M. (2016) Cultural-biology: Systemic consequences of our evolutionary natural drift as molecular autopoietic systems. Foundations of Science 21(4): 631–678. https://cepa.info/3900
Matyja J. R. & Schiavio A. (2013) Enactive Music Cognition: Background and Research Themes. Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 351-357. https://constructivist.info/8/3.351
McGee K. (2005) Enactive Cognitive Science. Part 1: History and Research Themes. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 19–34. https://constructivist.info/1/1.19
Meacham D. (2016) How low can you go? Bioenactivism, cognitive biology and umwelt ontology. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 9(31): 73–95. https://cepa.info/5707
Meloni M. & Reynolds J. (2021) Thinking embodiment with genetics: Epigenetics and postgenomic biology in embodied cognition and enactivism. Synthese 198: 10685–10708. https://cepa.info/6564
Menin D. & Schiavio A. (2012) Rethinking musical affordances. Avant 2: 202–215. https://cepa.info/4803
Merritt M. (2015) Dismantling standard cognitive science: It’s time the dog has its day. Biology and Philosophy 30(6): 811–829. https://cepa.info/3092
Meyer R. & Brancazio N. (2022) Putting down the revolt: Enactivism as a philosophy of nature. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 948733. https://cepa.info/8401
Mikkilineni R. (2022) A new class of autopoietic and cognitive machines. Information 13(1): 24. https://cepa.info/8025
Miller M. & Nave K. (2020) Slimes and cyborgs: Stretching the boundaries of life. Adaptive Behavior 28(1): 43–44. https://cepa.info/6302
Mingers J. (1990) The philosophical implications of Maturana’s cognitive theories. Systems Practice 3(6): 569–584. https://cepa.info/2778
Mingers J. (1991) The Cognitive Theories of Maturana and Varela. Systems Practice 4(4): 319–338. https://cepa.info/2253
Mingers J. (1992) The problems of social autopoiesis. International Journal of General Systems 21(2): 229–236. https://cepa.info/2811
Mingers J. (2001) Embodying information systems: The contribution of phenomenology. Information and Organization 11: 103–128. https://cepa.info/8221
Mingers J. (2013) Prefiguring Floridi’s Theory of Semantic Information. tripleC 11(2): 288–401. https://cepa.info/3623
Mitchell A. (2019) Second-order learning systems. Chapter 3 in: Second-order learning in developmental evaluation: New methods for complex conditionsPalgrave Pivot, Cham: 49–94. https://cepa.info/5715
Mora G. (1976) Vico and Piaget: Parallels and differences. Social Research 43(4): 699–712. https://cepa.info/6212
Moreno A., Etxeberria A. & Umerez J. (2008) The autonomy of biological individuals and artificial models. BioSystems 91(2): 309–319. https://cepa.info/3781
Morse A. F. & Ziemke T. (2008) On the role(s) of modeling in cognitive science. Pragmatics & Cognition 16(1): 37–56. https://cepa.info/7229
Mutelesi E. (2006) Radical Constructivism Seen with Edmund Husserl as Starting Point. Constructivist Foundations 2(1): 6–16. https://constructivist.info/2/1.6
Nasuto S. J. & Hayashi Y. (2016) , Anticipation: Beyond synthetic biology and cognitive robotics. Biosystems 148: 22–31. https://cepa.info/4366
Nes A., Sundberg K. & Watzl S. (2021) The perception/cognition distinction. Inquiry, Latest articles. https://cepa.info/7975
Norton A. & Alibali M. W. (2019) Mathematics in action. In: Norton A. & Alibali M. W. (eds.) Constructing number: Research in mathematics educationSpringer, Cham: 1–10. https://cepa.info/5724
Parada F. J. & Palacios-García I. (2022) Do not burn these gentle bridges: An empirical framework based on the 4E perspective is necessary, pertinent, and timely. Adaptive Behavior Online first. https://cepa.info/8687
Paucar-Caceres A. & Harnden R. (2011) Commentary on the Separate Prologues by Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela to the Second Edition of ‘De Máquinas y Seres Vivos – Autopoiesis: La organización de lo vivo’ – Twenty Years After. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 28(6): 577–580. https://cepa.info/2635
Peeters A. & Segundo-Ortin M. (2019) Misplacing memories? An enactive approach to the virtual memory palace. Consciousness and Cognition 76(102834). https://cepa.info/6676
Pescador Canales C. & Mojica L. (2022) Making us autonomous: The enactive normativity of morality. Topoi 41(2): 257–274. https://cepa.info/7872
Peschl M. F. (1997) The representational relation between environmental structures and neural systems: Autonomy and environmental dependency in neural knowledge representation. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology. and Life Sciences 1(2): 99–121. https://cepa.info/4749
Petitmengin C. & Lachaux J. P. (2013) Microcognitive sciences: Bridging experiential and neuronal microdynamics. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences 7: 617. https://cepa.info/934
Petlevski S. (2014) Beyond identity: The dynamic self at the intersection of performance philosophy and the philosophy of science. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 12(3): 187–209. https://cepa.info/4331
Petters D. (2016) An encounter between 4e cognition and attachment theory. Connection Science 28(4): 387–409. https://cepa.info/4542
Pols E. (1986) After the linguistic consensus: The real foundation question. Review of Metaphysics 40(1): 17–40. https://cepa.info/6214
Proulx J. (2013) Mental mathematics emergence of strategies, and the enactivist theory of cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics 84(3): 309–328. https://cepa.info/6850
Proulx J. (2013) Mental mathematics, emergence of strategies, and the enactivist theory of cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics 84(3): 309–328. https://cepa.info/4322
Páucar-Cáceres A. (2005) Language, the biology of cognition, emotions, and poetic language. Systemic Practice and Action Research 17(6): 591–602. https://cepa.info/7683
Quale A. (2014) Ethics: A Radical-constructivist Approach. Constructivist Foundations 9(2): 256–261. https://constructivist.info/9/2.256
Quale A. (2015) Religion: A Radical-Constructivist Perspective. Constructivist Foundations 11(1): 119–126. https://constructivist.info/11/1.119
Raleigh T. (2018) Tolerant enactivist cognitive science. Philosophical Explorations 21(2): 226–244. https://cepa.info/5677
Ramsey W. M. (2017) Must cognition be representational?. Synthese 194(11): 4197–4214. https://cepa.info/5605
Ramstead M. J. D., Kirchhoff M. D., Constant A. & Friston K. J. (2021) Multiscale integration: Beyond internalism and externalism. Synthese 198(S1): 41–70. https://cepa.info/7834
Ramírez-Vizcaya S. & Froese T. (2019) The enactive approach to habits: New concepts for the cognitive science of bad habits and addiction. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 301. https://cepa.info/5684
Ramírez-Vizcaya S. (2020) A world-involving theory of agency: review of Sensorimotor Life: An Enactive Proposal by Ezequiel Di Paolo, Thomas Buhrmann, and Xabier Barandiaran. Adaptive Behavior Online first. https://cepa.info/7860
Reid D. A. (2014) The coherence of enactivism and mathematics education research: A case study. Avant 5(2): 137–172. https://cepa.info/7105
Reybrouck M. (2001) Biological roots of musical epistemology: Functional cycles, Umwelt, and enactive listening. Semiotica 134(1–4): 599–633. https://cepa.info/4138
Reybrouck M. (2005) A biosemiotic and ecological approach to music cognition: Event perception between auditory listening and cognitive economy. Axiomathes – An International Journal in Ontology and Cognitive Systems 15(2): 229–266. https://cepa.info/4202
Riegler A. (1998) The end of science: Can we overcome cognitive limitations?. Evolution & Cognition 4(1): 37–50. https://cepa.info/4209
Riegler A. (2005) Act always so as to increase the number of scientific perspectives. Introduction to the Heinz von Foerster volume. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 6–14. https://cepa.info/1780
Riegler A. (2005) Constructive memory. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 89–104. https://cepa.info/1779
Riegler A. (2008) Natural or internal selection? The case of canalization in complex evolutionary systems. Artificial Life 14(3): 345–362. https://cepa.info/4215
Rodríguez Gómez S. (2016) Recurrences and human agential meaning grounding: Laying a path in walking. Biosemiotics 9(2): 169–184. https://cepa.info/8112
Rolla G. & Huffermann J. (2022) Converging enactivisms: Radical enactivism meets linguistic bodies. Adaptive Behavior 30(4): 345–359. https://cepa.info/7390
Rolla G. (2018) Radically enactive high cognition. Revista Dissertatio de Filosofia 47: 26–41. https://cepa.info/5687
Rubin S. S. C. (2017) From the cellular standpoint: Is DNA sequence genetic “information”?. Biosemiotics 10(2): 247–264. https://cepa.info/8014
Rusch G. (2007) Understanding. The Mutual Regulation of Cognition and Culture. Constructivist Foundations 2(2-3): 118–128. https://constructivist.info/2/2-3.118
Röhricht F., Gallagher S., Geuter U. & Hutto D. D. (2014) Embodied cognition and body psychotherapy: The construction of new therapeutic environments. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind. Brain & Culture 10(1): 11–20. https://cepa.info/8428
Sanches de Oliveira G., Raja V. & Chemero A. (2021) Radical embodied cognitive science and “Real Cognition”. Synthese 198(S1): 115–136. https://cepa.info/7979
Sanches de Oliveira G., van Es T. & Hipólito I. (2023) Scientific practice as ecological-enactive co-construction. Synthese 202(1): 4. https://cepa.info/8727
Schiavio A. & van der Schyff D. (2018) 4E music pedagogy and the principles of self-organization. Behavioral Sciences 8(8): 72. https://cepa.info/8119
Schlicht T. & Starzak T. (2021) Prospects of enactivist approaches to intentionality and cognition. Synthese 198(1): 89–113. https://cepa.info/7374
Scholte T. (2015) Proto-cybernetics in the Stanislavski System of acting: Past foundations, present analyses and future prospects. Kybernetes 44(8/9): 1371–1379. https://cepa.info/7371
Scott B. & Shurville S. (2011) What is a symbol?. Kybernetes 48(1/2): 12–22. https://cepa.info/1791
Scott B. (2011) Cognition and language. In: B. Scott, (ed.) Explorations in Second Order Cybernetics: Reflections on Cybernetics, Psychology and Education. Vienna, echoraum. https://cepa.info/1813
Scott B. (2011) Thinking mathematically. In: B. Scott, (ed.) Explorations in Second Order Cybernetics: Reflections on Cybernetics, Psychology and Education. Vienna, echoraum. https://cepa.info/1814
Sebastian M. A. (2018) Embodied appearance properties and subjectivity. Adaptive Behavior 26(5): 199–210. https://cepa.info/5804
Sedová T. (2007) Koštruktivizmus ako filozofia a sociológia vedy: Problémy, možnosti a limity. Filozofia 62(9): 750–764. https://cepa.info/8651
Shapiro L. & Stolz S. A. (2019) Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education 17(1): 19–39. https://cepa.info/7980
Sharkey N. E. & Ziemke T. (1998) A consideration of the biological and psychological foundations of autonomous robotics. Connection Science 10(3–4): 361–391. https://cepa.info/7224
Shin D. (2021) Embodying algorithms. Journal of Information Science, OnlineFirst. https://cepa.info/7389
Silberstein M. & Chemero A. (2012) Complexity and extended phenomenological-cognitive systems. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(1): 35–50. https://cepa.info/2400
Smock C. D. & Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Epistemology and education: The implications of radical constructivism for knowledge acquisition. Report #14. Follow Through Publications, Athens GA. https://cepa.info/1323
Sriraman B. & Wu K. (2020) Embodied cognition. In: Lerman S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Second editionSpringer, Cham: 266–268. https://cepa.info/6867
Stano P., Kuruma Y. & Damiano L. (2018) Synthetic biology and (embodied) artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges. Adaptive Behavior 26(1): 41–44. https://cepa.info/7853
Stapleton M. (2013) Steps to a “properly embodied” cognitive science. Cognitive Systems Research 22–23: 1–11. https://cepa.info/4543
Steffe L. P. & Glasersfeld E. von (1988) On the construction of the counting scheme. In: Steffe L. P. & Cobb P. (eds.) Construction of arithmetical meaning and strategiesSpringer, New York: 1–19. https://cepa.info/1399
Steffe L. P. (2017) Psychology in mathematics education: Past, present, and future. In: Galindo E. & Newton J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics EducationHoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, Indianapolis IN: 27–56. https://cepa.info/8233
Steffe L. P., Glasersfeld E. von, Richards J. & Cobb P. (1983) Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory, and application. Praeger, New York. https://cepa.info/1368
Steiner P. (2018) Reading and understanding: On some differences between Wittgenstein and 4E cognitive science. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 12(2): 124–137. https://cepa.info/5675
Steiner P. (2021) Radical views on cognition and the dynamics of scientific change. Synthese 198(S1): 547–569. https://cepa.info/7384
Stewart J. & Varela F. J. (1994) Cognition without neurons: Adaptation, learning and memory in the immune system. In: Benabou E. (ed.) Intelligence CollectiveHermes, Paris. https://cepa.info/1993
Stewart J. (1995) Cognition = life: Implications for higher-level cognition. Behavioural Processes 35(1-3): 311–326. https://cepa.info/2120
Stewart J. (2019) Neurophenomenology, enaction, and autopoïesis. In: Palermo S. & Morese R. (eds.) Behavioral NeuroscienceIntechOpen, London. https://cepa.info/6246
Strle T. (2012) Metacognition and decision making: Between first and third person perspective. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 10(3): 284–297. https://cepa.info/4328
Strle T. (2016) Feeling and thinking about the future: Offline metacognition in decision-making. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 14(4): 331–343. https://cepa.info/4333
Tam M. (2000) Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology and Society 3(2): 50–60. https://cepa.info/5204
Thelen E., Schöner G., Scheier C. & Smith L. (2001) The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 1–86. https://cepa.info/8390
Tomasello M. & Glasersfeld E. von (1975) The concepts of appearance, disappearance, and reappearance: A developmental semantic analysis. Follow Through Report #17. Follow Through Publications, Athens GA. https://cepa.info/1326
Tschacher W. & Scheier C. (2001) Embodied cognitive science: Concepts, methods and implications for psychology. In: Matthies M., Malchow H. & Kriz J. (eds.) Integrative systems approaches to natural and social dynamicsSpringer, Berlin: 551–567. https://cepa.info/3055
Umpleby S. A. (2016) Vladimir Lefebvre’s theory of two systems of ethical cognition. Systemics. Cybernetics and Informatics 14(5): 65–67. https://cepa.info/8732
Vallee-Tourangeau G. & Vallee-Tourangeau F. (2014) The Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Systemic Thinking. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 21(1–2): 113–127. https://cepa.info/3527
Varela F. J. (1986) Experimental epistemology: Background and future. Cahiers du Centre de Recherche, Epistemologie et Autonomie (CREA) 9: 107–121. https://cepa.info/1919
Varela F. J. (1996) The early days of autopoiesis: Heinz and Chile. Systems Research 13(3): 407–417. https://cepa.info/2077
Varela F. J. (2011) Preface to the second edition of “De Máquinas y Seres Vivos – Autopoiesis: La organización de lo vivo.” Translated by Alberto Paucar-Caceres and Roger Harnden. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 28(6): 601–617. https://cepa.info/2530
Vernon D. (2010) Enaction as a conceptual framework for developmental cognitive robotics. Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics 1(2): 89–98. https://cepa.info/4157
Vianna B. (2011) Co-ontogeny: A systemic approximation of language. AIBR – Revista de antropologia Iberoamericana 6(2): 135–158. https://cepa.info/7866
Videla R., Aguayo C. & Veloz T. (2021) From STEM to STEAM: An enactive and ecological continuum. Frontiers in Education. 6: 709560. https://cepa.info/8146
Villalobos M. & Silverman D. (2018) Extended functionalism, radical enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17(4): 719–739. https://cepa.info/4729
Villalobos M. (2013) Autopoiesis, life, mind and cognition: Bases for a proper naturalistic continuity. Biosemiotics 6(3): 379–391. https://cepa.info/2460
Wallace R. (2014) Dynamic statistical models of biological cognition: Insights from communications theory. Connection Science 26(4): 415–439. https://cepa.info/3962
Walmsley L. D. (2019) Lessons from a virtual slime: Marginal mechanisms, minimal cognition and radical enactivism. Adaptive Behavior Online First: 1059712318824544. https://cepa.info/5966
Walter S. (2010) Locked-in syndrome, BCI, and a confusion about embodied, embedded, extended, and enacted cognition. Neuroethics 3: 61–72. https://cepa.info/5898
Werner K. (2017) Coordination Produces Cognitive Niches, not just Experiences: A Semi-Formal Constructivist Ontology Based on von Foerster. Constructivist Foundations 12(3): 292–299. https://constructivist.info/12/3.292
Westermann C. (2020) Poiesis, ecology and embodied cognition. Technoetic Arts 18(1): 19–29. https://cepa.info/7237
Wheeler M. (2017) The revolution will not be optimised: Radical enactivism, extended functionalism and the extensive mind. Topoi 36(3): 457–472. https://cepa.info/4689
Whitaker R. (2007) Informing design praxis via 2nd‐order cybernetics. Kybernetes 36(9/10): 1558–1569. https://cepa.info/7745
Whitaker R. (2011) The Constructivist Foundations Bibliography: Humberto Maturana. Constructivist Foundations 6(3): 393–406. https://constructivist.info/6/3.393
Wilson M. (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(4): 625–636. https://cepa.info/4970
Xenakis I., Arnellos A., Spyrou T. & Darzentas J. (2012) Modelling Aesthetic Judgment An Interactive-semiotic Perspective. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 19(3): 25–51. https://cepa.info/3343
Yon D., de Lange F. P. & Press C. (2019) The predictive brain as a stubborn scientist. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23(1): 6–8. https://cepa.info/5797
Zahidi K. (2014) Non-representational cognitive science and realism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13(3): 461–475. https://cepa.info/2537
Zajda J. (2011) Constructivist pedagogy: Learning and teaching. Curriculum and Teaching 26(2): 19–31. https://cepa.info/7271
Zajda J. (2018) Effective constructivist pedagogy for quality learning in schools. Educational Practice & Theory 40(1): 67–80. https://cepa.info/7270
Zebrowski R. L. & McGraw E. B. (2021) Autonomy and openness in human and machine systems: Participatory sense-making and artificial minds. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness 8(2): 303–323. https://cepa.info/7908
Ziemke T. (2001) The construction of “reality” in the robot: Constructivist perspectives on situated AI and adaptive robotics. Special Issue “The Impact of Radical Constructivism on Science” edited by Alexander Riegler. Foundations of Science 6(1): 163–233. https://cepa.info/4522
Ziemke T. (2005) Cybernetics and embodied cognition: On the construction of realities in organisms and robots. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 118–128. https://cepa.info/784
Ziemke T. (2016) The body of knowledge: On the role of the living body in grounding embodied cognition. Biosystems 148: 4–11. https://cepa.info/4367
Zipoli Caiani S. (2021) Intensional biases in affordance perception: An explanatory issue for radical enactivism. Synthese 198(Suppl 17): 4183–4203. https://cepa.info/8419
de Bruin L. & Michael J. (2017) Prediction error minimization: Implications for embodied cognition and the extended mind hypothesis. Brain and Cognition 112: 58–63. https://cepa.info/5567
de Bruin L. & de Haan S. (2009) Enactivism & social cognition: In search of the whole story. Cognitive Semiotics 4(1): 225–250. https://cepa.info/7282
de Haan S. (2020) An enactive approach to psychiatry. Philosophy. Psychiatry & Psychology 27(1): 3–25. https://cepa.info/8413
van Dijk L. & Rietveld E. (2021) Situated anticipation. Synthese 198(1): 349–371. https://cepa.info/8097
van Duijn M. V., Keijzer F. A. & Franken D. (2006) Principles of minimal cognition: Casting cognition as sensorimotor coordination. Adaptive Behavior 14(2): 157–170. https://cepa.info/4813
van der Schyff D., Schiavio A., Walton A., Velardo V. & Chemero A. (2018) Musical creativity and the embodied mind: Exploring the possibilities of 4E cognition and dynamical systems theory. Music & Science 1: 20 September 2018. https://cepa.info/7379