This encyclopedia entry is in preparation.

Agmon E. (2020) Deriving the bodily grounding of living beings with molecular autopoiesis. Adaptive Behavior 28(1): 35–36. https://cepa.info/6270

Alessandroni N. (2018) Varieties of embodiment in cognitive science. Theory & Psychology 28(2): 227–248. https://cepa.info/8369

Asaro P. M. (2009) Information and regulation in robots, perception and consciousness: Ashby’s embodied minds. International Journal of General Systems 38(2): 111–128. https://cepa.info/348

Baerveldt C. & Verheggen T. (1999) Enactivism and the experiential reality of culture: Rethinking the epistemological basis of cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology 5(2): 183–206. https://cepa.info/2414

Barandiaran X. & Moreno A. (2006) On what makes certain dynamical systems cognitive: A minimally cognitive organization program. Adaptive Behavior 14(2): 171–185. https://cepa.info/4513

Bocchi G. & Damiano L. (2013) The enactive mind: An epistemological framework for radically embodied didactics. Education Sciences & Society 4(1): 113–134. https://cepa.info/8782

Borghi A. M. & Cimatti F. (2010) Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia 48(3): 763–773. https://cepa.info/8392

Brier S. (2009) Cybersemiotic Pragmaticism and Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 5(1): 19-39. https://constructivist.info/5/1.19

Brown S. D., Cromby J., Harper D. J., Johnson K. & Reavey P. (2011) Researching “experience”: Embodiment, methodology, process. Theory & Psychology 21(4): 493–515. https://cepa.info/8388

Butnor A. & MacKenzie M. (2022) Enactivism and gender performativity. In: Maitra K. & McWeeny J. (eds.) Feminist philosophy of mindOxford University Press, New York: 190–206. https://cepa.info/8753

Carney J. (2020) Thinking avant la lettre: A Review of 4E Cognition. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 4(1): 77–90. https://cepa.info/7884

Ceruti M. & Damiano L. (2018) Plural embodiment(s) of mind: Genealogy and guidelines for a radically embodied approach to mind and consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2204. https://cepa.info/5611

Chemero A. (1998) A stroll through the worlds of animats and humans: Review of Andy Clark’s Being there. Psyche 4: 24. https://cepa.info/2265

Clark A. (1999) An embodied cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(9): 345–351. https://cepa.info/5189

Constant A., Clark A. & Friston K. J. (2021) Representation wars: Enacting an armistice through active inference. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 598733. CEPA | Google | Google S. https://cepa.info/7831

Cowley S. J. (2019) The return of languaging: Toward a new ecolinguistics. Chinese Semiotic Studies 15(4): 483–512. https://cepa.info/8080

Cromby J. (2004) Between constructionism and neuroscience: The societal co-construction of embodied subjectivity. Theory and Psychology 14(6): 797–821. https://cepa.info/5554

De Haan S. & Fuchs T. (2010) The ghost in the machine: disembodiment in schizophrenia (two case studies). Psychopathology 43(5): 327–333. https://cepa.info/2268

De Jaegher H. (2013) Embodiment and sense-making in autism. Frontiers in Integrative neuroscience 7(15). https://cepa.info/2257

De Jaegher H., Pieper B., Clénin D. & Fuchs T. (2017) Grasping intersubjectivity: An invitation to embody social interaction research. Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences 16: 491–523. https://cepa.info/4350

De Jesus P. (2016) Making sense of (autopoietic) enactive embodiment: A gentle appraisal. Phainomena 25(98–99): 33–56. https://cepa.info/4133

Drayson Z. (2009) Embodied cognitive science and its implications for psychopathology.. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology 16(4): 329–340. https://cepa.info/7846

Díaz-Rojas D. & Soto-Andrade J. (2015) Enactive metaphoric approaches to randomness. In: Krainer K. & Vondrová N. (eds.) Proceedings of the ninth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 9)Charles University, Prague: 629–636. https://cepa.info/6844

Díaz-Rojas D., Soto-Andrade J. & Videla-Reyes R. (2021) Enactive Metaphorizing in the Mathematical Experience. Constructivist Foundations 16(3): 265–274. https://constructivist.info/16/3.265

Fabry R. E. (2018) Betwixt and between: The enculturated predictive processing approach to cognition. Synthese 195(6): 2483–2518. https://cepa.info/5389

Froese T. & Stewart J. (2012) Enactive cognitive science and biology of cognition: A response to Humberto Maturana. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 19(4): 61–74. https://cepa.info/2388

Froese T. (2013) Bio-machine hybrid technology: A theoretical assessment and some suggestions for improved future design. Philosophy & technology 27(4): 539–560. https://cepa.info/2272

Fuchs T. & Schlimme J. E. (2009) Embodiment and psychopathology: a phenomenological perspective. Current opinion in psychiatry 22: 570–575. https://cepa.info/2275

Gahrn-Andersen R. (2019) Biological simplexity and cognitive heteronomy. Language Sciences 71: 38–48. https://cepa.info/5836

Georgeon O. L. & Cordier A. (2014) Inverting the interaction cycle to model embodied agents. Procedia Computer Science 41: 243–248. https://cepa.info/3785

Glenberg A. & Robertson D. (2000) Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43: 379–401. https://cepa.info/8397

Gordon S. (2013) Psychoneurointracrinology: The embodied self. In: Gordon S. (ed.) Neurophenomenology and its applications to psychologySpringer, New York: 115–148. https://cepa.info/7312

Gordon S. (2015) Alan Watts and neurophenomenology. Self & Society 43(4): 311–321. https://cepa.info/3739

Johnson M. & Rohrer T. (2007) We are living creatures: Embodiment, American pragmatism, and the cognitive organism. In: Zlatev J., Ziemke T., Frank R. & Dirven R. (eds.) Body, language, and mind. Volume 1Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin: 17–54. https://cepa.info/7349

Kirchhoff M. (2018) Predictive processing, perceiving and imagining: Is to perceive to imagine, or something close to it?. Philosophical Studies 175(3): 751–767. https://cepa.info/6379

Krueger J. (2021) Enactivism, other minds, and mental disorders. Synthese 198: 365–389. https://cepa.info/6575

Kuniyoshi Y., Yorozu Y., Suzuki S., Sangawa S. & Nagakubo A. (2007) Emergence and development of embodied cognition: A constructivist approach using robots. Progress in Brain Research 164: 425–445. https://cepa.info/5853

Kyselo M. & Di Paolo E. (2015) Locked-in syndrome: A challenge for embodied cognitive science. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 14(3): 517–542. https://cepa.info/2283

Laner I. (2021) Reflective interventions: Enactivism and phenomenology on ways of bringing the body into intellectual engagement. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20: 443–461. https://cepa.info/7144

Matyja J. R. & Schiavio A. (2013) Enactive Music Cognition: Background and Research Themes. Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 351-357. https://constructivist.info/8/3.351

McGann M. (2007) Enactive theorists do it on purpose: Toward an enactive account of goals and goal-directedness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 463–483. https://cepa.info/4755

McGee K. (2006) Enactive Cognitive Science. Part 2: Methods, Insights, and Potential. Constructivist Foundations 1(2): 73–82. https://constructivist.info/1/2.73

McGregor S. (2020) Why living bodies could be dead weight. Adaptive Behavior 28(1): 49–50. https://cepa.info/6299

McInerney R. (2014) Neurophenomenology. In: Teo T. (ed.) Encyclopedia of critical psychologySpringer, New York: 1238–1242. https://cepa.info/7080

Meincke A. S. (2019) Systems or bodies? On how (not) to embody autopoiesis. Adaptive Behavior 28(2): 119–120. https://cepa.info/6116

Mingers J. (2001) Embodying information systems: The contribution of phenomenology. Information and Organization 11: 103–128. https://cepa.info/8221

Morse A. F., Herrera C., Clowes R., Montebelli A. & Ziemke T. (2011) The role of robotic modelling in cognitive science. New Ideas in Psychology 29(3): 312–324. https://cepa.info/7230

Moser S. (2008) "Walking and Falling." Language as Media Embodiment. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 260–268. https://constructivist.info/3/3.260

Neuman Y. (2003) Turtles all the way down: Outlines for a dynamic theory of epistemology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 20: 521–530. https://cepa.info/4823

Nielsen K. & Ward T. (2018) Towards a new conceptual framework for psychopathology: Embodiment, enactivism, and embedment. Theory & Psychology 28(6): 800–822. https://cepa.info/6117

Parthemore J. (2013) The unified conceptual space theory: An enactive theory of concepts. Adaptive Behavior 21(3): 168–177. https://cepa.info/6283

Pastena N. & Minichiello G. (2015) Neuro-phenomenology and neuro-physiology of learning in education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 174: 2368–2373. https://cepa.info/3780

Röhricht F., Gallagher S., Geuter U. & Hutto D. D. (2014) Embodied cognition and body psychotherapy: The construction of new therapeutic environments. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind. Brain & Culture 10(1): 11–20. https://cepa.info/8428

Sharkey N. E. & Ziemke T. (1998) A consideration of the biological and psychological foundations of autonomous robotics. Connection Science 10(3–4): 361–391. https://cepa.info/7224

Sharkey N. E. & Ziemke T. (2001) Mechanistic vs. phenomenal embodiment: Can robot embodiment lead to strong AI?. Cognitive Systems Research 2(4): 251–262. https://cepa.info/4519

Sriraman B. & Wu K. (2020) Embodied cognition. In: Lerman S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Second editionSpringer, Cham: 266–268. https://cepa.info/6867

Stano P., Kuruma Y. & Damiano L. (2018) Synthetic biology and (embodied) artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges. Adaptive Behavior 26(1): 41–44. https://cepa.info/7853

Stapleton M. (2013) Steps to a “properly embodied” cognitive science. Cognitive Systems Research 22–23: 1–11. https://cepa.info/4543

Stilwell P. & Harman K. (2021) Phenomenological research needs to be renewed: Time to integrate enactivism as a flexible resource. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20(1): 1–15. https://cepa.info/7756

Stolz S. A. (2015) Embodied learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 47(5): 474–487. https://cepa.info/3842

Thompson E. & Stapleton M. (2009) Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi 28(1): 23–30. https://cepa.info/2290

Torrance S. (2005) In search of the enactive: Introduction to the special issue on enactive experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4(4): 357–368. https://cepa.info/2539

Turner A. (2007) Hermeneutic resonance in animats and art. In: Almeida e Costa F., Rocha L. M., Costa E., Harvey I. & Coutinho A. (eds.) Advances in Artificial Life. 9th European Conference, ECAL 2007Springer, Berlin: 495–504. https://cepa.info/2679

Urrestarazu H. (2011) Autopoietic Systems: A Generalized Explanatory Approach – Part 2. Constructivist Foundations 7(1): 48–67. https://constructivist.info/7/1.48

Valdés-Zorrilla A., Díaz-Rojas D., Jiménez L. & Soto-Andrade J. (2023) Random Walks as a Royal Road to E-STEAM in Math Education. Constructivist Foundations 18(2): 259–276. https://constructivist.info/18/2.259

Vallee-Tourangeau G. & Vallee-Tourangeau F. (2014) The Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Systemic Thinking. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 21(1–2): 113–127. https://cepa.info/3527

Vernon D. (2010) Enaction as a conceptual framework for developmental cognitive robotics. Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics 1(2): 89–98. https://cepa.info/4157

Virgo N. (2020) The necessity of extended autopoiesis. Adaptive Behavior 28(1): 23–26. https://cepa.info/5958

Vörös S. & Gaitsch P. (2016) The horizons of embodiment: Introduction to the special issue. Phainomena 25(98–99): 5–32. https://cepa.info/4154

Vörös S. (2014) The Autopoiesis of Peace: Embodiment, Compassion, and the Selfless Self. Poligrafi 19(75/76): 125–148. https://cepa.info/2195

Weser V. U. & Proffitt D. R. (2021) Expertise in tool use promotes tool embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science 13(4): 597–609. https://cepa.info/7983

Zaslawski N. & Arminjon M. (2018) Shaun Gallagher and the Sciences of the Mind: Recontextualizing “Decentered” Cognition. Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 1–8. https://constructivist.info/14/1.1

Øberg G. K., Normann B. & Gallagher S. (2015) Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 31(4): 244–252. https://cepa.info/6922