| eq editor@constructivist.info|Admin:|Editor:
Explanation (Constructivist Encyclopedia)

Explanation

This encyclopedia entry is in preparation.

Related publications (24)

Abramova E. & Slors M. (2019) Mechanistic explanation for enactive sociality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18(2): 401–424. https://cepa.info/5837

Bich L. & Bechtel W. (2021) Mechanism, autonomy and biological explanation. Biology & Philosophy 36(6): 53. https://cepa.info/8106

De Jaegher H. (2023) Cognitive science today, what is it to you?. Journal of Consciousness Studies 30(11–12): 214–237. https://cepa.info/8872

Edgar S. (2013) The limits of experience and explanation: F. A. Lange and Ernst Mach on things in themselves. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21(1): 100–121. https://cepa.info/5729

González F. (2011) Living in Parenthesis. A Layman’s Experiences of Knowing Maturana. Constructivist Foundations 6(3): 388–392. https://constructivist.info/6/3.388

Herschbach M. (2012) On the role of social interaction in social cognition: A mechanistic alternative to enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11(4): 467–486. https://cepa.info/5834

Lyon P. (2006) The biogenic approach to cognition. Cognitive Processing 7(1): 11–29. https://cepa.info/7768

Markič O. (2012) First- and third-person approaches: The problem of integration. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 10(3): 213–222. https://cepa.info/4326

Maturana H. R. (1990) Science and daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. In: Krohn W., Küppers G. & Nowotny H. (eds.) Selforganization: Portrait of a scientific revolutionKluwer, Dordrecht: 12–35. https://cepa.info/607

Maturana H. R. (2000) The nature of the laws of nature. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17: 459–468. https://cepa.info/671

Maturana H. R. (2002) Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 9(3–4): 5–34. https://cepa.info/685

Meyer R. & Brancazio N. (2022) Putting down the revolt: Enactivism as a philosophy of nature. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 948733. https://cepa.info/8401

Meyer R. & Brancazio N. (2023) Enactivism: Utopian & Scientific. Constructivist Foundations 19(1): 1–11. https://constructivist.info/19/1.1

Miller M. & Clark A. (2018) Happily entangled: Prediction, emotion, and the embodied mind. Synthese 195(6): 2559–2575. https://cepa.info/5391

Moreira M. A. (2004) A epistemologia de Maturana. Ciência & Educação (Bauru) 10(3): 597–606. https://cepa.info/8844

Nielsen K. S. (2010) Representation and dynamics. Philosophical Psychology 23: 759–773. https://cepa.info/5808

Piccinini G. (2008) Computation without representation. Philosophical Studies 137(2): 205–241. https://cepa.info/3921

Prem E. (1995) Understanding complex systems: What can the speaking lion tell us?. In: Steels L. (ed.) The biology and technology of intelligent autonomous agentsSpringer, Berlin: 459–474. https://cepa.info/7738

Roberts M. (2018) Phenomenological constraints: A problem for radical enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17(2): 375–399. https://cepa.info/5625

Scheper W. J. & Scheper G. C. (1996) Autopsies on autopoiesis. Behavioral Science 41: 3–12. https://cepa.info/3990

Sprevak M. (2010) Computation, individuation, and the received view of representation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41: 260–270. https://cepa.info/3919

Stewart J. (2019) Afterword: A view from enaction. Language Sciences 71: 68–73. https://cepa.info/5674

Walmsley L. D. (2017) Please explain: Radical enactivism and its explanatory debt. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science SocietyCognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 1313–1318. https://cepa.info/5794

Walmsley L. D. (2019) Lessons from a virtual slime: Marginal mechanisms, minimal cognition and radical enactivism. Adaptive Behavior Online First: 1059712318824544. https://cepa.info/5966