This encyclopedia entry is in preparation.

Auvray M., Hanneton S., Lenay C. & O’Regan K. (2005) There is something out there: Distal attribution in sensory substitution, twenty years later. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 4(4): 505–521. https://cepa.info/4840

Balint T. S. & Pangaro P. (2017) The emerging roles of the observer on human space missions: Curated autonomy through boundary objects. In: Proceedings of the 68th International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2017), Volume 18International Astronautical Federation, Paris: 12309–12324. https://cepa.info/7369

Balsemão Pires E. (2016) Second order ethics as therapy. Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken. https://cepa.info/4578

Becerra G. (2016) De la autopoiesis a la objetividad: La epistemología de Maturana en los debates constructivistas [From autopoiesis to objectivity: Maturana’s epistemology within the constructivist debates]. Opción. Revista de ciencias humanas y sociales 32(80): 66–87. https://cepa.info/4528

Bilalov M. (2016) Радикальный конструктивизм в контексте современны� субъект-объектны� отношений. Scientific Thought Caucasus 85(1): 15–20. https://cepa.info/8068

Bitbol M. (2012) Downward causation without foundations. Synthese 185(2): 233–255. https://cepa.info/6657

Cardellini L. (2008) The views and influence of Ernst von Glasersfeld: An introduction. Foundations of Chemistry 10: 129–134. https://cepa.info/4002

Castañon G. (2015) O que é construtivismo? [What is constructivism?]. Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência, Campinas (Série 4) 1(2): 209–242. https://cepa.info/5961

Cobb T. (2006) Constructivism. In: Brown K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Second editionElsevier, Amsterdam: 85–87. https://cepa.info/4679

Cohen A. & Varela F. J. (2000) Facing up to the embarrassment: Psychoanalysis and cognitive neuroscience. Journal of European Psychoanalysis 10–11: 41–53. https://cepa.info/2084

Cyzman M. (2013) Beyond Objectiveness: Non-dualism and Fiction. Constructivist Foundations 8(2): 173-182. https://constructivist.info/8/2.173

Danielyan N. (2013) Subject’s rational cognitive activity in the theory of self-organization and epistemological constructivism. International Journal of Philosophy 1(4): 51–56. https://cepa.info/8227

Espejo R. (2022) Maturana’s path of objectivity-in-parenthesis. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 29(1–2): 63–76. https://cepa.info/7910

Fedulov I. N. & Khudobina O. F. (2017) О радикальности конструирования в «радикальном конструктивизме» [About the radicalism of construction in “radical constructivism”]. Science Journal of Volgograd State University: Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies 16(1): 36–44. https://cepa.info/8069

Fischer T. (2012) Design enigma: A typographical metaphor for epistemological processes, including designing. In: Fischer T., Biswas K. D., Ham R. T., Naka R. & Huang W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 17th CAADRIA ConferenceAssociation for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), Hong Kong: 679–688. https://cepa.info/5177

Foerster H. von (ed.) (1995) Cybernetics of cybernetics. Second edition. Future Systems Inc., Minneapolis. https://cepa.info/1774

Gash H. (2022) Humberto Maturana: Using his biological system in the social domain. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 29(1–2): 77–86. https://cepa.info/7918

Gasparyan D. (2020) Semiosis as Eigenform and Observation as Recursive Interpretation. Constructivist Foundations 15(3): 271–279. https://constructivist.info/15/3.271

Gentzel P. (2017) Praktisches Wissen und Materialität: Herausforderungen für kritisch- konstruktivistische Kommunikations- und Medienforschung. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 65(2): 275–293. https://cepa.info/6015

Gergen K. (2014) Social constructionism. In: Teo T. (ed.) Encyclopedia of critical psychologySpringer, New York: 1772–1776. https://cepa.info/7082

Glanville R. (1982) Inside every white box there are two black boxes trying to get out. Behavioural Science 12(1): 1–11. https://cepa.info/2365

Glanville R. (1990) “Sed quis custodient ipsos custodes?”. In: Heylighen F., Rosseel E & Demeyere F. (eds.) Self-steering and cognition in complex systemsGordon and Breach, London: 107–112. https://cepa.info/8523

Glanville R. (1996) Heinz von Foerster. The form and the content. Systems Research 13(3): 271–278. https://cepa.info/2918

Glanville R. (2006) Construction and Design. Constructivist Foundations 1(3): 103–110. https://constructivist.info/1/3.103

Glanville R. (2008) Second order cybernetics. Revised version. In: Parra-Luna F. (ed.) Systems science and cybernetics. Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCOEolss Publishers, Paris: Web publication. https://cepa.info/2708

Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Informationsübertragung, Konzeptuelle Semantik, Kybernetik, Objektivität, Wissen als Konstruk, Zeitkonzept. In: Tsvasman L. R. (ed.) Das große Lexikon, Medien und KommunikationErgon, Würzburg: 145, 211, 212, 2. https://cepa.info/1557

Goldman A. (2012) A moderate approach to embodied cognitive science. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3(1): 71–88. https://cepa.info/4966

Greve P. F. (2015) The role of prediction in mental processing: A process approach. New Ideas in Psychology 39: 45–52. https://cepa.info/5876

Guercini S. & Medlin C. J. (2020) A radical constructivist approach to boundaries in business network research. Industrial Marketing Management 91: 510–520. https://cepa.info/6906

Hennig C. (2009) A Constructivist View of the Statistical Quantification of Evidence. Constructivist Foundations 5(1): 39–54. https://constructivist.info/5/1.39

Himmelfreundpointner T. (2013) Wittgenstein, Rorty and Mitterer: On Aspects and Descriptions. Constructivist Foundations 8(2): 210–215. https://constructivist.info/8/2.210

Høffding S., Martiny K. & Roepstorff A. (2021) Can we trust the phenomenological interview? Metaphysical, epistemological, and methodological objections. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Online first. https://cepa.info/7289

Imoto S. (2004) The philosophical nature of Maturana’s theory of perception. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 11(2): 12–20. https://cepa.info/3285

Izquierdo-Torres E. & Di Paolo E. A. (2005) Is an embodied system ever purely reactive?. In: Capcarrere M. et al. (ed.) ECAL 2005: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Artificial LifeSpringer, Berlin: 252–261. https://cepa.info/4905

Kemp W. (2022) “Lügenpresse”, “alternative Fakten” und die epistemologische Naivität des sozialen Konstruktivismus [“Lying press”. cultura & psyché, 1–11. https://cepa.info/7825

Kjellman A. (2006) The crisis of contemporary science. Kybernetes 35(3/4): 497–521. https://cepa.info/2173

Krauß T. (1992) Das obskure Objekt der Psychologie. Psychologie und Gesellschaftskritik 16(3/4): 103–124. https://cepa.info/6465

Krippendorff K. (2019) The cybernetics of design and the design of cybernetics. In: Fischer T. & Herr C. M. (eds.) Design cybernetics: Navigating the newSpringer, Cham: 119–136. https://cepa.info/8767

Kögler H. (2009) Consciousness as Symbolic Construction: A Semiotics of Thought after Cassirer. Constructivist Foundations 4(3): 159–169. https://constructivist.info/4/3.159

Löfgren L. (1996) Shadows of language in physics and cybernetics. Systems Research 13(3): 329–340. https://cepa.info/4851

Maturana H. R., Bitbol M. & Luisi P. L. (2012) The Transcendence of the Observer. Discussions at the Conference “The Ethical Meaning of Francisco Varela’s Thought”. Constructivist Foundations 7(3): 174–179. https://constructivist.info/7/3.174

Meierhofer C. (2008) Continuing Discourses. On the References of Mitterer’s Non-dualistic Concept. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 127–133. https://constructivist.info/3/3.127

Müller H. F. J. (2007) Brain in Mind: The Mind–Brain Relation with the Mind at the Center. Constructivist Foundations 3(1): 30–37. https://constructivist.info/3/1.30

Müller K. H. (2015) De profundis. Ranulph Glanville’s transcendental framework for second-order cybernetics. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(2/3): 27–47. https://cepa.info/2699

Neges K. (2013) Non-dualism and World: Ontological Questions in the Non-dualizing Mode of Discourse. Constructivist Foundations 8(2): 158-165. https://constructivist.info/8/2.158

Ottermann R. (2005) Review essay: Constructivism is the invention of a critic. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research 6(3): 42. https://cepa.info/7873

Palacios A. G., Escobar M.-J. & Céspedes E. (2017) Missing Colors: The Enactivist Approach to Perception. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 117–125. https://constructivist.info/13/1.117

Scholl A. (2010) Radical Constructivism in Communication Science. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 51–57. https://constructivist.info/6/1.51

Scott B. (2005) Ranulph Glanville’s Objekte: an appreciation. In: D. Baecker, (ed.) Schlüsselwerke der Systemtheorie. Wiesbaden, VS. https://cepa.info/1786

Scott B. (2015) Putting flesh on the bones: Ranulph Glanville’s contributions to Conversation Theory. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(2–3): 59–71. https://cepa.info/3510

Seth A. (2015) Presence, objecthood, and the phenomenology of predictive perception. Cognitive Neuroscience 6(2–3): 111–117. https://cepa.info/6985

Smrdu M. (2022) Kaleidoscope of Pain: What and How Do You See Through It. Constructivist Foundations 17(2): 136–147. https://constructivist.info/17/2.136

Sofronieva E. & Shopov T. (2012) The Swing of the Pendulum: Objectivism or Constructivism in Language Education?. Journal of Preschool and Elementary School Education 2: 173–189. https://cepa.info/8677

Solari H. G. & Natiello M. A. (2019) A constructivist view of newton’s mechanics. Foundations of Science 24(2): 307–341. https://cepa.info/7836

Spencer J. P., Austin A. & Schutte A. R. (2012) Contributions of dynamic systems theory to cognitive development. Cognitive Development 27(4): 401–418. https://cepa.info/5883

Stern J. M. (2014) Jacob’s Ladder and Scientific Ontologies. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 21(3): 9–43. https://cepa.info/3312

Stewart J. (1995) Cognition = life: Implications for higher-level cognition. Behavioural Processes 35(1-3): 311–326. https://cepa.info/2120

Stewart J. (2001) Radical constructivism in biology and cognitive science. Special Issue “The Impact of Radical Constructivism on Science” edited by Alexander Riegler. Foundations of Science 6(1–3): 99–124. https://cepa.info/3634

Stewart-Williams S. (2003) Darwin and Descartes’ demon: On the possible evolutionary origin of belief in an external world. Evolution and Cognition 9: 123–130. https://cepa.info/5317

Strle T. (2018) Looping minds: How cognitive science exerts influence on its findings. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 16(4): 533–544. https://cepa.info/5666

Sánchez J. C. & Loredo J. C. (2009) Constructivisms from a genetic point of view: A critical classification of current tendencies. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 43(4): 332–349. https://cepa.info/5676

Thompson E., Palacios A. & Varela F. J. (1992) Ways of coloring: Comparative color vision as a case study in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15(1): 1–26. https://cepa.info/2075

Thompson P. W. (2014) Constructivism in mathematics education. In: Lerman S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of mathematics educationSpringer, Berlin: 96–102. https://cepa.info/2952

Thompson P. W. (2020) Constructivism in mathematics education. In: Lerman S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Second editionSpringer, Cham: 128–134. https://cepa.info/6891

Weber S. (2008) The Object of Description is the Description of the Object So Far: Non-dualism and Beyond. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 140–147. https://constructivist.info/3/3.140

Weibel P. (2008) Tertium Datur. Historical Preconditions and Ways to Mitterer’s Non-dualizing Philosophy. Constructivist Foundations 3(3): 134–139. https://constructivist.info/3/3.134

Wheeler M. (1995) Escaping from the Cartesian mind-set: Heidegger and artificial life. In: Morán F., Moreno A. J., Merelo J. & Chacon P. (eds.) Advances in artificial lifeSpringer, Berlin: 65–76. https://cepa.info/2945

Xu F., Dewar K. & Perfors A. (2009) Induction, overhypotheses, and the shape bias: Some arguments and evidence for rational constructivism. In: Hood B. M. & Santos L. (eds.) The origins of object knowledgeOxford University Press, New York NY: 263–284. https://cepa.info/6397

Zimmer R. S. (2001) Variations on a string bag: Using Pask’s principles for practical course design. Kybernetes 30(7/8): 1006–1024. https://cepa.info/6839