This encyclopedia entry is in preparation.

Allen M. & Friston K. (2018) From cognitivism to autopoiesis: Towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese 195(6): 2459–2482. https://cepa.info/4099

Arnellos A. & Darzentas J. (2007) Exploring Creativity in the Design Process: A Systems-Semiotic Perspective. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 14(1): 37–64. https://cepa.info/3329

Bickhard M. H. (2011) Some consequences (and enablings) of process metaphysics. Axiomathes 21: 3–32. https://cepa.info/4464

Bosancic B. (2020) Information, data, and knowledge in the cognitive system of the observer. Journal of Documentation 76(4): 893–908. https://cepa.info/8061

Brown S. D., Cromby J., Harper D. J., Johnson K. & Reavey P. (2011) Researching “experience”: Embodiment, methodology, process. Theory & Psychology 21(4): 493–515. https://cepa.info/8388

Bunnell P. & Riegler A. (2011) Maturana Across the Disciplines. Constructivist Foundations 6(3): 287–292. https://constructivist.info/6/3.287

Carta G. & Falzon P. (2018) Co-constructing organizational autopoiesis: The developmental laboratory as a model and means of enabling interventions. In: Bagnara S., Tartaglia R., Albolino S., Alexander T. & Fujita Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018)Springer, Cham: 566–576. https://cepa.info/6574

Cheung K. C. (1993) On meaningful measurement: Issues of reliability and validity from a humanistic constructivist information-processing perspective. In: Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, 1–4 August 1993Misconceptions Trust, Ithaca NY. https://cepa.info/7243

Ciot M. G. (2009) A constructivist approach to educational action’s structure. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Horticulture 66(2): 621–626. https://cepa.info/7815

Clark A. (2013) Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3): 181–204. https://cepa.info/7285

Clavel Vázquez M. J. (2020) A match made in heaven: Predictive approaches to (an unorthodox) sensorimotor enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 19(4): 653–684. https://cepa.info/7832

Cohen L. B., Chaput H. H. & Cashon C. H. (2002) A constructivist model of infant cognition. Cognitive Development 17: 1323–1343. https://cepa.info/5849

Coll C. (1996) Constructivismo y educación escolar: Ni hablamos siempre de lo mismo ni lo hacemos siempre desde la misma perspectiva epistemológica. [Constructivism and education: We neither speak about the same thing. nor do we it in the same way] Anuario de Psicología 69: 153–178. https://cepa.info/4634

Crippen M. (2023) Anticipating and enacting worlds: Moods, illness and psychobehavioral adaptation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Online first. https://cepa.info/8985

De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507. https://cepa.info/2387

De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sensemaking. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507. https://cepa.info/5063

Fabry R. E. (2018) Betwixt and between: The enculturated predictive processing approach to cognition. Synthese 195(6): 2483–2518. https://cepa.info/5389

Facchin M. & Negro N. (2023) Predictive processing and extended consciousness: Why the machinery of consciousness is (probably) still in the head and the DEUTS argument won’t let it leak outside. In: Casper M.-O. & Artese G. F. (eds.) Situated cognition research: Methodological foundationsSpringer, Cham: 181–208. https://cepa.info/9026

Fischer T. (2008) Obstructed magic: On the myths of observing designing and of sharing design observations. In: Nakpan W., Mahaek E., Teeraparbwong K. & Nilkaew P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th CAADRIAPimniyom Press, Chiang Mai: 278–284. https://cepa.info/5174

Fischer T. (2011) When is analog? When is digital?. Kybernetes 40(7/8): 1004–1014. https://cepa.info/5176

Foerster H. von (ed.) (1995) Cybernetics of cybernetics. Second edition. Future Systems Inc., Minneapolis. https://cepa.info/1774

Gallagher S. (2018) Decentering the Brain: Embodied Cognition and the Critique of Neurocentrism and Narrow-Minded Philosophy of Mind. Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 8–21. https://constructivist.info/14/1.8

Gash H. (2014) Constructing Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 9(3): 302–310. https://constructivist.info/9/3.302

Gunstone R. F. & Northfield J. R. (1988) Inservice education: Some constructivist perspectives and examples. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, 5–9 April 1988. https://cepa.info/6686

Gärtner K. & Clowes R. W. (2017) Enactivism, radical enactivism and predictive processing: What is radical in cognitive science? Kairos. Journal of Philosophy & Science 18(1): 54–83. https://cepa.info/4501

Herr C. M. (2019) Constructing cybernetic thinking, Design, and education. In: Fischer T. & Herr C. M. (eds.) Design cybernetics: Navigating the newSpringer, Cham: 153–170. https://cepa.info/6408

Heylighen F. & Busseniers E. (2023) Modeling autopoiesis and cognition with reaction networks. Biosystems 230: 104937. https://cepa.info/8470

Hohwy J. (2020) New directions in predictive processing. Mind & Language 35(2): 209–223. https://cepa.info/7841

Hutto D. D. (2018) Getting into predictive processing’s great guessing game: Bootstrap heaven or hell?. Synthese 195(6): 2445–2458. https://cepa.info/5388

Jachna T. (2012) Reclaiming The Cyber(netic) City. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 19(3): 67–81. https://cepa.info/3411

Kirchhoff M. (2018) Predictive processing, perceiving and imagining: Is to perceive to imagine, or something close to it?. Philosophical Studies 175(3): 751–767. https://cepa.info/6379

Kirchhoff M. D. & Robertson I. (2018) Enactivism and predictive processing: A non-representational view. Philosophical Explorations 21(2): 264–281. https://cepa.info/5840

Kirchhoff M. D. (2015) Experiential fantasies, prediction, and enactive minds. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22(3–4): 68–92. https://cepa.info/4907

Korbak T. (2021) Computational enactivism under the free energy principle. Synthese 198(3): 2743–2763. https://cepa.info/6568

Köppen M. & Ruiz-del-Solar J. (1999) Autopoiesis and image processing: Detection of structure and organization in images. In: Mira J. & Sánchez-Andrés J. V. (eds.) International work-conference on artificial neural networksSpringer, Berlin: 442–451. https://cepa.info/5713

Limone A. & Bastias L. E. (2006) Autopoiesis and knowledge in the organization: Conceptual foundation for authentic knowledge management. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23: 39–49. https://cepa.info/3934

Maldonato M. (2009) From neuron to consciousness: For an experience-based neuroscience. World Futures 65(2): 80–93. https://cepa.info/3832

Meincke A. S. (2019) Autopoiesis, biological autonomy and the process view of life. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9(1): 1. https://cepa.info/5669

Merrell F. (2009) Musement, Play, Creativity: Nature’s Way. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 16(3–4): 89–106. https://cepa.info/3404

Miller M. & Nave K. (2020) Slimes and cyborgs: Stretching the boundaries of life. Adaptive Behavior 28(1): 43–44. https://cepa.info/6302

Moss D. (1981) Phenomenology and neuropsychology: Two approaches to consciousness. In: Valle R. & Eckartsberg R. (eds.) The metaphors of consciousnessPlenum Press, New York: 153–166. https://cepa.info/7449

Müller K. H. (2010) The Radical Constructivist Movement and Its Network Formations. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 31–39. https://constructivist.info/6/1.31

Nave K. (2021) Visual experience in the predictive brain is univocal, but indeterminate. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Online first. https://cepa.info/7291

Neuman Y. (2001) Existing as “a difference that makes a difference”: on cybernetics, semiotics, and being. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 8(3): 25–34. https://cepa.info/3184

Neuman Y. (2003) Turtles all the way down: Outlines for a dynamic theory of epistemology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 20: 521–530. https://cepa.info/4823

Pace Giannotta A. (2016) Epistemology and ontology of the quality: An introduction to the enactive approach to qualitative ontology. HUMANA.MENTE Journal of Philosophical Studies 9(31): 1–19. https://cepa.info/4511

Parini P. (2011) Ernst von Glasersfeld and the Italian Operational School: Didactic Implications of Operational Awareness. Constructivist Foundations 6(2): 140–149. https://constructivist.info/6/2.140

Perkins D. (1991) Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage?. Educational Technology 31(5): 18–23. https://cepa.info/5220

Perotto F. S. (2013) A Computational Constructivist Model as an Anticipatory Learning Mechanism for Coupled Agent–Environment Systems. Constructivist Foundations 9(1): 46–56. https://constructivist.info/9/1.46

Prosen T. (2022) A Moving Boundary, a Plastic Core: A Contribution to the Third Wave of Extended-Mind Research. Constructivist Foundations 17(3): 220–230. https://constructivist.info/17/3.220

Richards L. D. & Young R. K. (1996) Propositions on cybernetics and social transformation: Implications of von Foerster’s non-trivial machine for knowledge processes. Systems Research 13(3): 363–370. https://cepa.info/2788

Richards L. D. (2007) Connecting Radical Constructivism to Social Transformation and Design. Constructivist Foundations 2(2-3): 129–135. https://constructivist.info/2/2-3.129

Riegler A. (2007) Superstition in the machine. In: Butz M. V., Sigaud O., Pezzulo G. & Baldassarre G. (eds.) Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems: From brains to individual and social behavior. Lecture Notes in Artificial IntelligenceSpringer, New York: 57–72. https://cepa.info/4214

Rossi P. G., Prenna V., Giannandrea L. & Magnoler P. (2013) Enactivism and didactics: Some research lines. Education Sciences & Society 4(1): 37–57. https://cepa.info/8779

Schmidt S. J. (2010) Radical Constructivism: A Tool, not a Super Theory!. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 6–11. https://constructivist.info/6/1.6

Schmidt S. J. (2010) Self-Organisation and Learning Culture. Constructivist Foundations 5(3): 121–129. https://constructivist.info/5/3.121

Schmidt S. J. (2011) From Objects to Processes: A Proposal to Rewrite Radical Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 7(1): 1–9 & 37–47. https://constructivist.info/7/1.1

Schmidt S. J. (2017) Konstruktivistische Argumentationen als Reflexionsangebote für die Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 65(2): 207–218. https://cepa.info/4238

Scott B. & Bansal A. (2013) A Cybernetic Computational Model for Learning and Skill Acquisition. Constructivist Foundations 9(1): 125–136. https://constructivist.info/9/1.125

Seth A. (2015) Presence, objecthood, and the phenomenology of predictive perception. Cognitive Neuroscience 6(2–3): 111–117. https://cepa.info/6985

Shin D. (2021) Embodying algorithms. Journal of Information Science, OnlineFirst. https://cepa.info/7389

Shutaleva A. (2023) Epistemic challenges in neurophenomenology: Exploring the reliability of knowledge and its ontological implications. Philosophies 8(5): 94. https://cepa.info/9045

Sorensen B. & Thellefsen T. (2009) Evolution, the True Scientist, and His Attraction to the Highest Good: The Growth in the Concrete Reasonableness According to Peirce. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 16(1–2): 9–25. https://cepa.info/3299

Stadler M. & Kruse P. (2004) Appearance of structure and emergence of meaning in the visual system. In: Carsetti A. (ed.) Seeing, thinking and knowingSpringer, Dordrecht: 293–306. https://cepa.info/5217

Steiner P. (2018) Reading and understanding: On some differences between Wittgenstein and 4E cognitive science. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 12(2): 124–137. https://cepa.info/5675

Taylor E. (2013) Déjà vu: William James on “The Brain and the Mind,” 1878: A comment on current trends in neurophenomenology defining the application of James’s radical empiricism to psychology. In: Gordon S. (ed.) Neurophenomenology and its applications to psychologySpringer, New York: 89–114. https://cepa.info/7311

Urrestarazu H. (2012) Autopoietic Systems: A Generalized Explanatory Approach – Part 3: The Scale of Description Problem. Constructivist Foundations 7(3): 180-195. https://constructivist.info/7/3.180

Valenzuela-Moguillansky C. & Vásquez-Rosati A. (2019) An Analysis Procedure for the Micro-Phenomenological Interview. Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 123–145. https://constructivist.info/14/2.123

Varela F. J. (1986) Experimental epistemology: Background and future. Cahiers du Centre de Recherche, Epistemologie et Autonomie (CREA) 9: 107–121. https://cepa.info/1919

Vega F. (2023) The cell as a realization of the (M, R) system. Biosystems 225: 104846. https://cepa.info/8471

Veloz T. (2021) Goals as emergent autopoietic processes. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 9: 720652. https://cepa.info/7851

Wheeler M. (2016) The rest is science: What does phenomenology tell us about cognition. In: Reynolds J. & Sebold R. (eds.) Phenomenology and sciencePalgrave Macmillan, New York: 87–101. https://cepa.info/6195

Wiese W. & Friston K. J. (2021) Examining the continuity between life and mind: Is there a continuity between autopoietic intentionality and representationality?. Philosophies 6(1): 18. https://cepa.info/7830

Williams D. (2018) Predictive minds and small-scale models: Kenneth Craik’s contribution to cognitive science. Philosophical Explorations 21(2): 245–263. https://cepa.info/5821

Windt J. M. (2018) Predictive brains, dreaming selves, sleeping bodies: How the analysis of dream movement can inform a theory of self- and world-simulation in dreams. Synthese 195(6): 2577–2625. https://cepa.info/5392

de Lange F. P., Heilbron M. & Kok P. (2018) How do expectations shape perception?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22(9): 764–779. https://cepa.info/5800