This encyclopedia entry is in preparation.

Related publications (61)

Allen M. & Friston K. (2018) From cognitivism to autopoiesis: Towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese 195(6): 2459–2482.

Arnellos A. & Darzentas J. (2007) Exploring Creativity in the Design Process: A Systems-Semiotic Perspective. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 14(1): 37–64.

Bickhard M. H. (2011) Some consequences (and enablings) of process metaphysics. Axiomathes 21: 3–32.

Bunnell P. & Riegler A. (2011) Maturana Across the Disciplines. Constructivist Foundations 6(3): 287–292.

Carta G. & Falzon P. (2018) Co-constructing organizational autopoiesis: The developmental laboratory as a model and means of enabling interventions. In: Bagnara S., Tartaglia R., Albolino S., Alexander T. & Fujita Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018)Springer, Cham: 566–576.

Cheung K. C. (1993) On meaningful measurement: Issues of reliability and validity from a humanistic constructivist information-processing perspective. In: Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, 1–4 August 1993Misconceptions Trust, Ithaca NY.

Clark A. (2013) Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3): 181–204.

Cohen L. B., Chaput H. H. & Cashon C. H. (2002) A constructivist model of infant cognition. Cognitive Development 17: 1323–1343.

Coll C. (1996) Constructivismo y educación escolar: Ni hablamos siempre de lo mismo ni lo hacemos siempre desde la misma perspectiva epistemológica. [Constructivism and education: We neither speak about the same thing. nor do we it in the same way] Anuario de Psicología 69: 153–178.

De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507.

De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sensemaking. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507.

Fabry R. E. (2018) Betwixt and between: The enculturated predictive processing approach to cognition. Synthese 195(6): 2483–2518.

Fischer T. (2008) Obstructed magic: On the myths of observing designing and of sharing design observations. In: Nakpan W., Mahaek E., Teeraparbwong K. & Nilkaew P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th CAADRIAPimniyom Press, Chiang Mai: 278–284.

Fischer T. (2011) When is analog? When is digital?. Kybernetes 40(7/8): 1004–1014.

Gallagher S. (2018) Decentering the Brain: Embodied Cognition and the Critique of Neurocentrism and Narrow-Minded Philosophy of Mind. Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 8–21.

Gash H. (2014) Constructing Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 9(3): 302–310.

Gunstone R. F. & Northfield J. R. (1988) Inservice education: Some constructivist perspectives and examples. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, 5–9 April 1988.

Gärtner K. & Clowes R. W. (2017) Enactivism, radical enactivism and predictive processing: What is radical in cognitive science? Kairos. Journal of Philosophy & Science 18(1): 54–83.

Herr C. M. (2019) Constructing cybernetic thinking, Design, and education. In: Fischer T. & Herr C. M. (eds.) Design cybernetics: Navigating the newSpringer, Cham: 153–170.

Hutto D. D. (2018) Getting into predictive processing’s great guessing game: Bootstrap heaven or hell?. Synthese 195(6): 2445–2458.

Jachna T. (2012) Reclaiming The Cyber(netic) City. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 19(3): 67–81.

Kirchhoff M. (2018) Predictive processing, perceiving and imagining: Is to perceive to imagine, or something close to it?. Philosophical Studies 175(3): 751–767.

Kirchhoff M. D. & Robertson I. (2018) Enactivism and predictive processing: A non-representational view. Philosophical Explorations 21(2): 264–281.

Kirchhoff M. D. (2015) Experiential fantasies, prediction, and enactive minds. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22(3–4): 68–92.

Korbak T. (2019) Computational enactivism under the free energy principle. Synthese Online first.

Köppen M. & Ruiz-del-Solar J. (1999) Autopoiesis and image processing: Detection of structure and organization in images. In: Mira J. & Sánchez-Andrés J. V. (eds.) International work-conference on artificial neural networksSpringer, Berlin: 442–451.

Limone A. & Bastias L. E. (2006) Autopoiesis and knowledge in the organization: Conceptual foundation for authentic knowledge management. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23: 39–49.

Maldonato M. (2009) From neuron to consciousness: For an experience-based neuroscience. World Futures 65(2): 80–93.

Meincke A. S. (2019) Autopoiesis, biological autonomy and the process view of life. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9(1): 1.

Merrell F. (2009) Musement, Play, Creativity: Nature’s Way. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 16(3–4): 89–106.

Miller M. & Nave K. (2020) Slimes and cyborgs: Stretching the boundaries of life. Adaptive Behavior 28(1): 43–44.

Moss D. (1981) Phenomenology and neuropsychology: Two approaches to consciousness. In: Valle R. & Eckartsberg R. (eds.) The metaphors of consciousnessPlenum Press, New York: 153–166.

Müller K. H. (2010) The Radical Constructivist Movement and Its Network Formations. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 31–39.

Nave K. (2021) Visual experience in the predictive brain is univocal, but indeterminate. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Online first.

Neuman Y. (2001) Existing as “a difference that makes a difference”: on cybernetics, semiotics, and being. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 8(3): 25–34.

Neuman Y. (2003) Turtles all the way down: Outlines for a dynamic theory of epistemology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 20: 521–530.

Pace Giannotta A. (2016) Epistemology and ontology of the quality: An introduction to the enactive approach to qualitative ontology. Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 31: 1–19.

Parini P. (2011) Ernst von Glasersfeld and the Italian Operational School: Didactic Implications of Operational Awareness. Constructivist Foundations 6(2): 140–149.

Perkins D. (1991) Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage?. Educational Technology 31(5): 18–23.

Perotto F. S. (2013) A Computational Constructivist Model as an Anticipatory Learning Mechanism for Coupled Agent–Environment Systems. Constructivist Foundations 9(1): 46–56.

Richards L. D. & Young R. K. (1996) Propositions on cybernetics and social transformation: Implications of von Foerster’s non-trivial machine for knowledge processes. Systems Research 13(3): 363–370.

Richards L. D. (2007) Connecting Radical Constructivism to Social Transformation and Design. Constructivist Foundations 2(2-3): 129–135.

Riegler A. (2007) Superstition in the machine. In: Butz M. V., Sigaud O., Pezzulo G. & Baldassarre G. (eds.) Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems: From brains to individual and social behavior. Lecture Notes in Artificial IntelligenceSpringer, New York: 57–72.

Schmidt S. J. (2010) Radical Constructivism: A Tool, not a Super Theory!. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 6–11.

Schmidt S. J. (2010) Self-Organisation and Learning Culture. Constructivist Foundations 5(3): 121–129.

Schmidt S. J. (2011) From Objects to Processes: A Proposal to Rewrite Radical Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 7(1): 1–9 & 37–47.

Schmidt S. J. (2017) Konstruktivistische Argumentationen als Reflexionsangebote für die Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 65(2): 207–218.

Scott B. & Bansal A. (2013) A Cybernetic Computational Model for Learning and Skill Acquisition. Constructivist Foundations 9(1): 125–136.

Seth A. (2015) Presence, objecthood, and the phenomenology of predictive perception. Cognitive Neuroscience 6(2–3): 111–117.

Shin D. (2021) Embodying algorithms. Journal of Information Science, OnlineFirst.

Sorensen B. & Thellefsen T. (2009) Evolution, the True Scientist, and His Attraction to the Highest Good: The Growth in the Concrete Reasonableness According to Peirce. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 16(1–2): 9–25.

Stadler M. & Kruse P. (2004) Appearance of structure and emergence of meaning in the visual system. In: Carsetti A. (ed.) Seeing, thinking and knowingSpringer, Dordrecht: 293–306.

Steiner P. (2018) Reading and understanding: On some differences between Wittgenstein and 4E cognitive science. RIFL 13(2): 124–137.

Taylor E. (2013) Déjà vu: William James on “The Brain and the Mind,” 1878: A comment on current trends in neurophenomenology defining the application of James’s radical empiricism to psychology. In: Gordon S. (ed.) Neurophenomenology and its applications to psychologySpringer, New York: 89–114.

Urrestarazu H. (2012) Autopoietic Systems: A Generalized Explanatory Approach – Part 3: The Scale of Description Problem. Constructivist Foundations 7(3): 180-195.

Valenzuela-Moguillansky C. & Vásquez-Rosati A. (2019) An Analysis Procedure for the Micro-Phenomenological Interview. Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 123–145.

Varela F. J. (1986) Experimental epistemology: Background and future. Cahiers du Centre de Recherche, Epistemologie et Autonomie (CREA) 9: 107–121.

Wheeler M. (2016) The rest is science: What does phenomenology tell us about cognition. In: Reynolds J. & Sebold R. (eds.) Phenomenology and sciencePalgrave Macmillan, New York: 87–101.

Williams D. (2018) Predictive minds and small-scale models: Kenneth Craik’s contribution to cognitive science. Philosophical Explorations 21(2): 245–263.

Windt J. M. (2018) Predictive brains, dreaming selves, sleeping bodies: How the analysis of dream movement can inform a theory of self- and world-simulation in dreams. Synthese 195(6): 2577–2625.

de Lange F. P., Heilbron M. & Kok P. (2018) How do expectations shape perception?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22(9): 764–779.