This encyclopedia entry is in preparation.

Related publications (179)

Abramova E. & Slors M. (2018) Mechanistic explanation for enactive sociality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18(2): 401–424.

Abramova E., Slors M. & van Rooij I. (2017) Enactive mechanistic explanation of social cognition. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science SocietyCognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 45–50.

Alrøe H. F. & Noe E. (2014) Second-Order Science of Interdisciplinary Research: A Polyocular Framework for Wicked Problems. Constructivist Foundations 10(1): 65–76.

Anderson M. L., Richardson M. J. & Chemero A. (2012) Eroding the boundaries of cognition: Implications of embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(4): 717–730.

Arango A. (2019) Social enactivism about perception – reply to McGann. Adaptive Behavior 27(2): 161–162.

Baxter H. (2013) Niklas Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic legal systems. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9: 167–184.

Bednarz J. Jr. (1988) Autopoiesis: The organizational closure of social systems. Systems Research 5(1): 57–64.

Belbase S. (2014) Radical versus social constructivism: An epistemological-pedagogical dilemma. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 1(2): 98–112.

Broonen J. P. (1998) Social autopoiesis: A concept in search of a theory. AIP Conference Proceedings 437: 284–294.

Buchinger E. (2012) Luhmann and the Constructivist Heritage: A Critical Reflection. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 19–28.

Butz M. V. (2008) How and Why the Brain Lays the Foundations for a Conscious Self. Constructivist Foundations 4(1): 1–14 & 32–37.

Bächtold M. (2013) What do students “construct” according to constructivism in science education?. Research in Science Education 43(6): 2477–2496.

Cadenas H. & Arnold M. (2015) The Autopoiesis of Social Systems and its Criticisms. Constructivist Foundations 10(2): 169–176.

Canaparo C. (2012) Migration and radical constructivist epistemology. Crossings Journal of Migration and Culture 3(2): 181–200.

Carrier N. (2008) Speech for the defense of a radically constructivist sociology of (criminal) law. International Journal of Law. Crime and Justice 36(3): 168–183.

Carvalho E. M. D. (2021) The shared know-how in Linguistic Bodies. Filosofia Unisinos 22(1): 94–101.

Castañon G. (2015) O que é construtivismo? [What is constructivism?]. Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência, Campinas (Série 4) 1(2): 209–242.

Castañon G. A. (2005) Construtivismo e ciências humanas. Ciências e Cognição 5: 36–49.

Charlton M. C. (1993) Self-referential systems theory: A discussion of some theoretical developments. In: Stowell F. A., West D. & Howell J. G. (eds.) Systems science: Addressing global issuesSpringer, Boston MA: 631–635.

Chavalarias D. (2016) The unlikely encounter between von Foerster and Snowden: When second-order cybernetics sheds light on societal impacts of Big Data. Big Data & Society 3(1): 1–11.

Chryssides A., Dashtipour P., Keshet S., Righi C., Sammut G. & Sartawi M. (2009) We don’t share! The social representation approach, enactivism and the fundamental incompatibilities between the two. Culture & Psychology 15(1): 83–95.

Cromby J. (2004) Between constructionism and neuroscience: The societal co-construction of embodied subjectivity. Theory and Psychology 14(6): 797–821.

Cuffari E. C., Di Paolo E. & De Jaegher H. (2015) From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14(4): 1089–1125.

Daanen P. (2009) Conscious and non-conscious representation in social representations theory: Social representations from the phenomenological point of view. Culture & Psychology 15(3): 372–385.

Dahlbohm B. (1992) The idea that reality is socially constructed. In: Floyd C. Z. H., Budde R. & Keil-Slawik R. (eds.) Software development and reality constructionSpringer-Verlag, Berlin: 101–126.

De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507.

De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sensemaking. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507.

De Jaegher H. & Froese T. (2009) On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive Behavior 17(5): 444–460.

De Jaegher H. (2013) Embodiment and sense-making in autism. Frontiers in Integrative neuroscience 7(15).

De Jaegher H. (2015) How we affect each other: Michel Henry’s “pathos-with” and the enactive approach to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22(1–2): 112–132.

De Jaegher H. (2018) The intersubjective turn. In: Newen A., De Bruin L. & Gallagher S. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of 4E cognitionOxford University Press, Oxford: 453–468.

De Jaegher H., Peräkylä A. & Stevanovic M. (2016) The co-creation of meaningful action: Bridging enaction and interactional sociology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371(1693): 20150378.

Detel W. (2015) Social constructivism. In: Wright J. D. (ed.) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Second editionElsevier, Amsterdam: 228–234.

Di Paolo E. & De Jaegher H. (2017) Neither individualistic nor interactionist. In: Durt C., Fuchs T. & Tewes C. (eds.) Embodiment, enaction, and cultureMIT Press, Cambridge MA: 87–105.

Di Paolo E. A., Rohde M. & lizuka H. (2008) Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction?. New Ideas in Psychology, 26(2), 278294.

Dierckxsens G. (2020) Enactive cognition and the other: Enactivism and Levinas meet halfway. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 28(1): 100–120.

Dougall C. (2001) An Aristotelian solution to the problem of social autopoiesis. International Journal of General Systems 30(5): 561–584.

Drüeke R., Klaus E. & Thiele M. (2017) Eine Genealogie des Konstruktivismus in der kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Geschlechterforschung. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 65(2): 219–235.

Du Plessis M. J. M. & Ferreira S. B. (2000) Konstruktivisme, konstruksionisme en maatskaplike werk. Koers: Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 65(1): 17–44.

Dyer G., Jones J., Rowland G. & Zweifel S. (2015) The Banathy Conversation Methodology. Constructivist Foundations 11(1): 42–50.

Elder-Vass D. (2007) Luhmann and emergentism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37(4): 408–432.

Enslin M. (2013) Listening and Unentitled. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 20(1–2): 23–29.

Espejo R. (2004) The footprint of complexity: The embodiment of social systems. Kybernetes 33(3/4): 671–700.

Esposito E. (2017) Artificial communication? The production of contingency by algorithms. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 46(4): 249–65.

Fiebich A. (2019) Second workshop on enactive approaches to mind in health and disease. Adaptive Behavior 27(3): 181–182.

Fleischaker G. R. (1992) “Are osmotic or social systems autopoietic?” A reply in the negative. International Journal of General Systems 21(2): 163–173.

Foerster H. von (1996) La società industriale del futuro. Pluriverso 1(4): 109–115.

Fourlas G. N. & Cuffari E. C. (2022) Enacting ought: ethics, anti-racism, and interactional possibilities. Topoi 41(2): 355–371.

Froese T. & Di Paolo E. (2011) The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics and Cognition 19(1): 1–36.

Froese T. & Di Paolo E. A. (2009) Sociality and the life–mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(4): 439–463.

Froese T. & Fuchs T. (2012) The extended body: A case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11: 205–235.

Froese T. & Gallagher S. (2012) Getting interaction theory (IT) together: Integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction. Interaction Studies 13(3): 436–468.

Fuchs C. (2005) The Internet as a Self-Organizing Socio-Technological System. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 12(3): 37–81.

Gadenne V. (2017) Ist der Konstruktivismus selbstwidersprüchlich. In: Kanzian C., Kletzl S., Mitterer J. & Neges K. (eds.) Realism – relativism – constructivismDe Gruyter, Berlin: 31–43.

Gallagher S. & Allen M. (2018) Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition. Synthese 195(6): 2627–2648.

Gallagher S. & Miyahara K. (2012) Neo-pragmatism and enactive intentionality. In: Schulkin J. (ed.) Action, perception and the brain: Adaptation and cephalic expressionPalgrave Macmillan, London: 117–146.

Gallagher S. (2008) Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition 17(2): 535–543.

Gallagher S. (2013) The socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research 25: 4–12.

Gallagher S. (2016) Intercorporeity: Enaction, simulation, and the science of social cognition. In: Reynolds J. & Sebold R. (eds.) Phenomenology and sciencePalgrave Macmillan, New York: 161–179.

Gallagher S. (2018) Decentering the Brain: Embodied Cognition and the Critique of Neurocentrism and Narrow-Minded Philosophy of Mind. Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 8–21.

Gash H. & Murphy-Lejeune E. (2005) Children's perceptions of other cultures. In: Deegan J., Devine D. & Lodge A. (eds.) Primary voices: Equality diversity and childhood in irish primary schoolsInstitute of Public Administration, Dublin Ireland: 205–221.

Gash H. (2010) Realities in Radical Constructivism. Commentary on Johnson’s “Footprints in the Sand”. Constructivist Foundations 6(1): 100–101.

Gash H., Romeu N. I. & Pina J. A. L. (2004) Spanish and Irish images of special needs: Perceptions of inclusion. In: Walsh P. N. & Gash H. (eds.) Lives and Times: Practice Policy and People with disabilityWordwell, Dublin: 180–223.

Gergen K. (2014) Social constructionism. In: Teo T. (ed.) Encyclopedia of critical psychologySpringer, New York: 1772–1776.

Geyer F. (2002) The march of self-reference. Kybernetes 31(7/8): 1021–1042.

Gillett E. (1998) Relativism and the social constructivist paradigm. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 5: 37–48.

Glasersfeld E. von (2000) Problems of constructivism. In: Steffe L. P. & Thompson P. W. (eds.) Radical constructivism in action: Building on the pioneering work of Ernst von GlasersfeldRoutledge/Falmer, London: 3–9.

Goldspink C. & Kay R. (2004) Bridging the micro–macro divide: A new basis for social science. Human Relations 57(5): 597–618.

Goldstein B. (2021) Materialism and Selection Bias: Political Psychology from a Radical Constructivist Perspective. Constructivist Foundations 16(3): 327–338.

Halsall F. (2012) Niklas Luhmann and the body. The New Bioethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body 18(1): 4–20.

Halsema A. (2020) Becoming an embodied social self capable of relating to norms: Ricoeur’s narrative identity reconsidered in the light of enactivism. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 28(1): 121–142.

Heimstadt M. (2015) Societal Self-observation in the Time of Datafication: Interfunctional Analysis of the Chilean Open Data Web Portal. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(4): 57–73.

Hejl P. M. (2011) The Individual in Radical Constructivism. Some Critical Remarks from an Evolutionary Perspective. Constructivist Foundations 6(2): 227–234.

Hennig C. (2010) Mathematical models and reality: A constructivist perspective. Foundations of Science 15(1): 29–48.

Hepp A. & Hasebrink U. (2017) Kommunikative Figurationen: Ein konzeptioneller Rahmen zur Erforschung kommunikativer Konstruktionsprozesse in Zeiten tiefgreifender Mediatisierung. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 65(2): 330–347.

Herschbach M. (2012) On the role of social interaction in social cognition: A mechanistic alternative to enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11(4): 467–486.

Herting S. & Stein L. (2007) The evolution of Luhmann’s systems theory with focus on the constructivist influence. International Journal of General Systems 36(1): 1–17.

Hjorth A. & Wilensky U. (2014) Redesigning your city: A constructionist environment for urban planning education. Informatics in Education 13(2): 197–208.

Hoemann K., Xu F. & Barrett L. (2019) Emotion words, emotion concepts, and emotional development in children: A constructionist hypothesis. Developmental Psychology 55: 1830–1849.

Honkela T. (2005) Von Foerster meets Kohonen: Approaches to artificial intelligence, cognitive science and information systems development. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 40–53.

Izmirli I. M. (2014) Wittengstein’s language games and forms of life from a social constructivist point of view. American Journal of Educational Research 2(5): 291–298.

Jurgens A. & Kirchhoff M. D. (2019) Enactive social cognition: Diachronic constitution & coupled anticipation. Consciousness and Cognition 70: 1–10.

Karafillidis A. (2013) Comment: Socializing a Calculus: The Emergence of a Theory of Social Forms and a. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 20(3–4): 108–141.

Kawade Y. (2009) On the nature of the subjectivity of living things. Biosemiotics 2(2): 205–220.

Kemp W. (2022) “Lügenpresse”, “alternative Fakten” und die epistemologische Naivität des sozialen Konstruktivismus [“Lying press”. cultura & psyché, 1–11.

Kenny V. (1992) On the subject of autopoiesis and its boundaries: Does the subject matter?. International Journal of General Systems 21(2): 187–196.

Kenny V. (2011) Continuous Dialogues. Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Answers to a Wide Variety of Questioners on the Oikos Web Site 1997–2010. Constructivist Foundations 6(2): 204–212.

Kesselring T. & Müller U. (2011) The concept of egocentrism in the context of Piaget’s theory. New Ideas in Psychology 29: 327–345.

Khalifa K. (2010) Social constructivism and the aims of science. Social Epistemology 24(1): 45–61.

Klassen A. (2018) Social constructionism and relativism: An aporia?. Dialogue 57: 303–321.

Klenk M. (2013) Comment: The Form of Expectation Considerations on Social Structure. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 20(3–4): 173–187.

Krippendorff K. (1996) A second-order cybernetics of otherness. Systems Research 13(3): 311–328.

Krueger J. (2021) Enactivism, other minds, and mental disorders. Synthese 198: 365–389.

Kynigos C. (2015) Designing Constructionist E-Books: New Mediations for Creative Mathematical Thinking?. Constructivist Foundations 10(3): 305–313.

Lenartowicz M. (2015) The nature of the university. Higher Education 69(6): 947–961.

Lenartowicz M., Weinbaum D. & Braathen P. (2016) The individuation of social systems: A cognitive framework. Procedia Computer Science 88: 15–20.

Lepskiy V. (2018) Evolution of cybernetics: Philosophical and methodological analysis. Kybernetes 47(2): 249–261.

Luhmann N. (1982) The world society as a social system. International Journal of General Systems 8(3): 131–138.

Luhmann N. (1989) Law as a social system. Northwestern University Law Review 83: 136–150.

Luhmann N. (2006) System as difference. Organization 13(1): 37–57.

Lünenborg M. (2017) Von Mediengattungen zu kontingenten Hybriden: Konstruktivistische und performativitätstheoretische Perspektiven für die Journalistik. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 65(2): 367–384.

Marin L. (2022) Enactive principles for an ethics of social media user interactions: How to overcome systematic misunderstandings through shared meaning-making. Topoi, Online first.

Mingers J. (1989) An Introduction to Autopoiesis – Implications and Applications. Systems Practice 2(2): 159–180.

Mingers J. (1992) The problems of social autopoiesis. International Journal of General Systems 21(2): 229–236.

Mingers J. (1996) A comparison of Maturana’s autopoietic social theory and Giddens’ theory of structuration. Systems Research 13(3): 469–482.

Mingers J. (1997) A critical evaluation of Maturana’s constructivist family therapy. Systems Practice 10(2): 137–151.

Mora G. (1976) Vico and Piaget: Parallels and differences. Social Research 43(4): 699–712.

Morus I. R. (2015) Science: Constructivist perspectives, history of. In: Wright J. D. (ed.) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Second edition. Volume 21Elsevier, Amsterdam: 225–228.

Murray D. (2007) Systems for Social Sustainability: Global Connectedness and the Tuvalu Test. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 14(1): 87–105.

Métais F. & Villalobos M. (2022) Levinas’ otherness: An ethical dimension for enactive sociality. Topoi 41(2): 327–339.

Müller K. H. (2008) Methodologizing Radical Constructivism. Recipes for RC-Designs in the Social Sciences. Constructivist Foundations 4(1): 50–61.

Neimeyer R. A. & Torres C. (2015) Constructivism and constructionism: Methodology. In: Wright J. D. (ed.) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Second edition. Volume 4Elsevier, Amsterdam: 724–728.

Neimeyer R. A. & Winter D. A. (2015) Constructivist theory and psychotherapy. In: Wright J. D. (ed.) International encyclopedia of the social & sciences. Second edition. Volume 4Elsevier, Amsterdam: 729–732.

Noe E. & Alrøe H. F. (2006) Combining Luhmann and Actor-Network Theory to See Farm Enterprises as Self-organizing Systems. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 13(1): 34–48.

North A. (2016) A Millennial Mistake: Three Arguments Against Radical Social Constructivism. Journal of Counseling & Development 94(1): 114–122.

Ostrom C. S., Martin W. J. & Zacharakis J. (2008) Autopoiesis and the cosmology of postmodern adult education. Adult Education Quarterly 58(4): 299–317.

Palmaru R. (2012) Making Sense and Meaning: On the Role of Communication and Culture in the Reproduction of Social Systems. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 63-75.

Palmer K. (2013) Special Systems Theory. Accepted for the Complex Adaptive Systems Conference of 2013 and 2014 but not be presented.

Paris S. G. & Byrnes J. P. (1989) The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In: Zimmerman B. J. & Schunk D. (eds.) Self-regulated learning and academic theory, research, and practiceSpringer-Verlag, New York: 169–199.

Porr B. & Di Prodi P. (2014) Subsystem Formation Driven by Double Contingency. Constructivist Foundations 9(2): 199–211.

Pors J. G. (2015) Is the System Badly Named? Noise as the Paradoxical (Non-)foundation of Social Systems Theory. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(4): 75–89.

Pouw W. T. J. L. & de Jong H. L. (2015) Rethinking situated and embodied social psychology. Theory & Psychology 25(4): 411–433.

Praetorius N. (2003) Inconsistences in the assumptions of constructivism and naturalism. Theory & Psychology 13(4): 511–539.

Radosavljevic M. (2008) Autopoiesis vs. social autopoiesis: Critical evaluation and implications for understanding firms as autopoietic social systems. International Journal of General Systems 37(2): 215–230.

Raimondi V. (2019) The role of languaging in human evolution: An approach based on the theory of natural drift. Chinese Semiotic Studies 15(4): 675–696.

Raimondi V. (2022) La matrice operazionale del languaging: Un approccio radicalmente relazionale del linguaggio. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 15(2): 49–58.

Raskin J. D. & Neimeyer R. A. (2003) Coherent constructivism: A response to Mackay. Theory & Psychology 13: 431–443.

Ratner C. (2006) Epistemological, social, and political conundrums in social constructionism. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 7(1): 4.

Reichertz J. (2017) Die Bedeutung des kommunikativen Handelns und der Medien im Kommunikativen Konstruktivismus. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 65(2): 252–274.

Reid D. A. (2014) The coherence of enactivism and mathematics education research: A case study. Avant 5(2): 137–172.

Richards L. D. & Young R. K. (1996) Propositions on cybernetics and social transformation: Implications of von Foerster’s non-trivial machine for knowledge processes. Systems Research 13(3): 363–370.

Richards L. D. (2007) Connecting Radical Constructivism to Social Transformation and Design. Constructivist Foundations 2(2-3): 129–135.

Richards L. D. (2013) Idea avoidance: Reflections of a conference and its language. Kybernetes 42(9/10): 1464–1470.

Riegler A. & Scholl A. (2012) Niklas Luhmann and the Sociological Turn in Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 1–4.

Riegler A. & Steffe L. P. (2014) “What Is the Teacher Trying to Teach Students if They Are All Busy Constructing Their Own Private Worlds?”: Introduction to the Special Issue. Constructivist Foundations 9(3): 297–301.

Robb F. F. (1992) Autopoiesis and supra-human systems. International Journal of General Systems 21(2): 197–205.

Rolla G. & Figueiredo N. (2021) Bringing forth a world, literally. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Online first.

Rolla G. (2018) Radically enactive high cognition. Revista Dissertatio de Filosofia 47: 26–41.

Roth S. & Clark C. & Berkel J. (2017) The fashionable functions reloaded: An updated Google Ngram view of trends in functional differentiation (1800-2000). In: Mesquita A. (ed.) Research paradigms and contemporary perspectives on human-technology interactionIGI Global, Hershey: 236–265.

Roth S. & Schutz A. (2015) Ten Systems: Toward a Canon of Function Systems. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22(4): 11–31.

Roth S. (2016) Growth and function: a viral research program for next organisations. International Journal of Technology Management 72(4): 296–309.

Sandoval Moya J. (2010) Construccionismo, conocimiento y realidad: Una lectura crítica desde la psicología social [Constructionism, knowledge and reality: A critical reading from social psychology]. Revista Mad 23: 31–37.

Schatten M. & Bača M. (2010) A critical review of autopoietic theory and its applications to living, social, organizational and information systems. Journal of General Social Issues 19(4–5): 837–852.

Schaurhofer M. & Markus F. P. M. F. (2005) Autonomy: starting point and goal of personal and social change: A constructivist perspective on knowledge management in empowerment processes. Kybernetes 34(1/2): 261–277.

Scholl A. (2012) Author’s Response: What Constructivism Does not Say. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 15–18.

Scholl A. (2012) Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann’s Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint. Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 5–12.

Schultz E. A. (2010) Fear of scandalous knowledge: Arguing about coherence in scientific theory and practice. Reviews in Anthropology 39(4): 313–343.

Scott B. (2001) Cybernetics and the social sciences. Systems Research 18: 411–420.

Scott B. (2007) Facilitating organisational change: some sociocybernetic principles. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Organisational Change 4(1): 3–14.

Scott B. (2009) The role of sociocybernetics in understanding world futures. Kybernetes 38(6): 867–882.

Segovia-Cuéllar A. (2022) Revisiting the social origins of human morality: A constructivist perspective on the nature of moral sense-making. Topoi 41(2): 313–325.

Seidl D. & Becker K. H. (2006) Organizations as distinction generating and processing systems: Niklas Luhmann’s contribution to organization studies. Organization 13(1): 9–35.

Sridharan V. (2015) Beyond consensual domains: Enactivism, social representations and third-order unities. Culture & Psychology 21(2): 259–275.

Stern J. M. (2007) Cognitive constructivism, eigen-solutions, and sharp statistical hypotheses. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 14(1): 9–36.

Strle T. (2018) Looping minds: How cognitive science exerts influence on its findings. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 16(4): 533–544.

Svenaeus F. (2022) Health and illness as enacted phenomena. Topoi 41(2): 373–382.

Taylor P. C. (2015) Constructivism. In: Gunstone R. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of science educationSpringer, New York: 218–224.

Teubner G. (2001) Alienating justice: On the surplus value of the twelfth camel. In: Pribáñ J. & Nelken D. (eds.) Law’s new boundaries: The consequences of legal autopoiesisAshgate, Aldershot: 21–44.

Thompson P. W. (2014) Constructivism in mathematics education. In: Lerman S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of mathematics educationSpringer, Berlin: 96–102.

Thompson P. W. (2020) Constructivism in mathematics education. In: Lerman S. (ed.) Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Second editionSpringer, Cham: 128–134.

Turpin M. (2017) Autopoiesis and structuration theory: A framework to investigate the contribution of a development project to a rural community. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 34(6): 671–685.

Umpleby S. A. (2016) Second-Order Cybernetics as a Fundamental Revolution in Science. Constructivist Foundations 11(3): 455–465.

Umpleby S. A., Medvedeva T. A. & Lepskiy V. (2019) Recent developments in cybernetics. from cognition to social systems Cybernetics and Systems : Latest Articles.

Urrestarazu H. (2014) Social Autopoiesis?. Constructivist Foundations 9(2): 153–166.

Van Grunsven J. (2018) Enactivism, second-person engagement and personal responsibility. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17(1): 131–156.

Vanderstraeten R. (2000) Autopoiesis and socialization: On Luhmann’s reconceptualization of communication and socialization. British Journal of Sociology 51(3): 581–598.

Vanderstraeten R. (2002) Parsons, Luhmann and the theorem of double contingency. Journal of Classical Sociology 2: 77–92.

Verheggen T. & Baerveldt C. (2007) We don’t share! The social representation approach, enactivism and the ground for an intrinsically social Psychology. Culture & Psychology 13(1): 5–27.

Verheggen T. & Baerveldt C. (2012) Mixed up perspectives: Reply to Chryssides et al. and Daanen and their critique of enactive cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology 18(2): 272–284.

Vowe G. (2017) Theoretische Ansätze als kommunikative Konstruktionen: Optionen und Konsequenzen einer konstruktivistischen Erklärung der Wissenschaftsentwicklung. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 65(2): 236–251.

Wood E. & Bennett N. (1998) Teachers’ theories of play: Constructivist or social constructivist?. Early Child Development and Care 140(1): 17–30.

Young R. A. & Collin A. (2004) Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of Vocational Behaviour 64(3): 373–388.

Zaslawski N. (2018) Neurodialectics: A Proposal for Philosophy of Cognitive and Social Sciences. Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 42–55.

Zebrowski R. L. & McGraw E. B. (2021) Autonomy and openness in human and machine systems: Participatory sense-making and artificial minds. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness 8(2): 303–323.

Zeleny M. (1985) Spontaneous social orders. International Journal of General Systems 11: 2–117.

de Bruin L. & de Haan S. (2009) Enactivism & social cognition: In search of the whole story. Cognitive Semiotics 4(1): 225–250.

de Haan S. (2017) The existential dimension in psychiatry: An enactive framework. Mental Health. Religion and Culture 20(6): 528–535.

de Haan S. (2021) Bio-psycho-social interaction: An enactive perspective. International Review of Psychiatry 33(5): 471–477.

kurtz T. (2013) Occupation as a Form and the Theory of Society. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 20(1–2): 127–140.